首页> 外文期刊>Democratization >Against the Odds: Deviant Cases of Democratization
【24h】

Against the Odds: Deviant Cases of Democratization

机译:反对赔率:民主化的极端案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Economic development and diffusion effects appear to exert substantial influence on the success of democratization. However, large-N quantitative studies also show that there are some 'outliers', or 'deviant' cases, which do not fit the general pattern and cannot be explained by existing theories and models. It appears that deviant cases of democratization include Costa Rica and India (since the 1940s), Botswana (since the 1960s) and Benin and Mongolia (since the 1990s). This introduction focuses on important conceptual, theoretical, and methodological problems involved when studying them. We first look at the highly contested concept of democracy and place 'deviant democracies' in the framework of a minimal definition of democracy and transition waves. We also provide a working definition for two other highly contested concepts - democratic transition and democratic consolidation. We then go on to briefly review existing general theories of democratization. By doing so, we lay the ground for specifying more precisely the level of 'deviancy' of our cases, and offer potential explanations for their unusually successful process of democratization. Finally, we outline the nested mixed method, the logic of which we follow in this special issue.
机译:经济发展和扩散效应似乎对民主化的成功产生重大影响。但是,大型N定量研究也表明,存在一些“异常值”或“异常”情况,它们不符合一般模式,无法用现有的理论和模型进行解释。民主化的异常案例似乎包括哥斯达黎加和印度(自1940年代起),博茨瓦纳(自1960年代起)以及贝宁和蒙古(自1990年代起)。本简介着重研究重要的概念,理论和方法问题。我们首先来看一个备受争议的民主概念,并将“反民主”置于民主和过渡浪潮的最低限度框架内。我们还为另外两个备受争议的概念(民主过渡和民主巩固)提供了可行的定义。然后,我们继续简要回顾一下现有的民主化一般理论。通过这样做,我们为更精确地指定案例的“差异性”水平奠定了基础,并为它们异常成功的民主化进程提供了可能的解释。最后,我们概述了嵌套混合方法,在本期特刊中将遵循其逻辑。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号