首页> 外文期刊>Democratization >Uncertainty and the epistemic dimension of democratic deliberation in climate change adaptation
【24h】

Uncertainty and the epistemic dimension of democratic deliberation in climate change adaptation

机译:气候变化适应中民主审议的不确定性和认识论层面

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Climate change adaptation is inherently local, contextual, and political, a problem distinct from the global collective action problem that is climate stabilization. Climate change vulnerability is a function not only of hydro-meteorological changes, specific geographic contexts, ecosystem integrity, and economic poverty, but also of the social and political institutions of a given local or regional context. The uncertainty, complexity, and inherent politics of climate change adaptation in particular places mean that adaptive institutions, if they are to be more than just disaster prediction and response mechanisms, must be flexible, dynamic and capable themselves of adapting quickly to changing environmental, economic, and social conditions. Certain approaches to adaptation have moved away from rigid orthodox development models. Nonetheless, they are often so general as to be impractical, or in effect comprise repackaged concepts and methods borrowed from climate change mitigation efforts and international development institutions. This study discusses the epistemic dimension of democracy at the level of international environmental institutions and at the level of local, contextually unique adaptation projects. Development and adaptation practices that involve democratic participation do so largely in accordance with norms of fairness and justice, which are unquestionably important. Attaching democracy exclusively to transcendent norms of justice, however, belies concrete possibilities for democratic approaches to climate adaptation. These possibilities reside in the epistemic dimension of democracy, a pragmatic notion developed. The account suggests that an epistemic democratic conceptual framework can inform adaptation institutions that are better able to cope with complexity and uncertainty, even ultimately directing these lessons towards the international sphere's institutional focus on mitigation.View full textDownload full textKeywordsclimate change adaptation, epistemic democracy, uncertainty, complex systems, international environmental governance, sustainable development, institutionsRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.709687
机译:气候变化的适应性本质上是地方性的,背景性的和政治性的,这一问题与气候稳定的全球集体行动问题不同。气候变化脆弱性不仅是水文气象变化,特定地理环境,生态系统完整性和经济贫困的函数,而且是给定本地或区域环境下的社会和政治机构的函数。特定地区气候变化适应的不确定性,复杂性和固有的政治性意味着,适应性机构,如果不仅仅是灾难预测和响应机制,还必须具有灵活性,动态性,并能够快速适应不断变化的环境,经济,以及社会条件。某些适应方法已经脱离了严格的正统发展模型。但是,它们通常过于笼统以至于不切实际,或者实际上包括从减缓气候变化努力和国际发展机构借来的重新包装的概念和方法。这项研究在国际环境机构层面和地方的,根据情况而定的适应项目层面讨论了民主的认识论层面。涉及民主参与的发展和适应做法在很大程度上符合公平和正义的准则,这无疑是重要的。然而,仅将民主置于超越性的正义准则之上,就为采取民主方式适应气候变化提供了具体可能性。这些可能性存在于民主的认知层面,这是一种务实的观念。该论述表明,认识论民主的概念框架可以为适应机构提供更好的能力,使其能够更好地应对复杂性和不确定性,甚至最终将这些经验教训引导到国际领域对缓解的体制重点上。查看全文下载全文关键词气候变化适应,认识论民主,不确定性,复杂的系统,国际环境治理,可持续发展,机构相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多” ,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.709687

著录项

  • 来源
    《Democratization》 |2012年第5期|p.889-911|共23页
  • 作者

    Thomas C. Hildea*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:06:35

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号