首页> 外文期刊>Democratization >The two sides of functional cooperation with authoritarian regimes: a multi-level perspective on the conflict of objectives between political stability and democratic change
【24h】

The two sides of functional cooperation with authoritarian regimes: a multi-level perspective on the conflict of objectives between political stability and democratic change

机译:与独裁政权进行职能合作的两个方面:政治稳定与民主变革之间目标冲突的多层次视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Development cooperation exemplifies the conflict of foreign policy objectives between short-term political stability and long-term democratic change that international actors face in their relations with authoritarian regimes. Previous studies have found empirical evidence for two seemingly contradictory effects of functional cooperation: democratization and the stabilization of authoritarian regimes. Taking EU-Morocco cooperation on water management as an example, this article demonstrates that the effect of functional cooperation depends on the level of policy-making examined. Although cooperation may stabilize an authoritarian regime at the macro-level of the overall polity by contributing to the effective handling of economic and social grievances (output legitimacy), it can also introduce democratic governance at the level of state administration (input legitimacy). Methodologically, the article applies both multivariate regression analyses and qualitative comparative case studies in order to explore data from diverse sources including an original survey of Moroccan state officials, interviews with governmental and non-governmental representatives, and legal texts. The article points to the complexity of the effects that external activities can have on governance in recipient countries, and highlights the importance of improving our knowledge of the more indirect effects of functional cooperation at levels below the overall polity.View full textDownload full textKeywordsArab authoritarian regimes, democracy promotion, conflicting objectives, European Union, functional cooperation, water managementRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.674363
机译:发展合作体现了国际行为者在与威权政权的关系中面临的短期政治稳定与长期民主变革之间的外交政策目标冲突。先前的研究发现了功能合作的两个看似矛盾的效果的经验证据:民主化和威权政权的稳定。以欧盟与摩洛哥在水资源管理方面的合作为例,本文证明了功能合作的效果取决于所研究的决策水平。尽管合作可以通过促进有效处理经济和社会不满(产出合法性)而在整体政体的宏观水平上稳定威权政体,但它也可以在国家行政管理水平上引入民主治理(投入合法性)。从方法上讲,本文运用了多元回归分析和定性比较案例研究,以探索来自各种来源的数据,包括对摩洛哥国家官员的原始调查,与政府和非政府代表的访谈以及法律文本。这篇文章指出了外部活动对受援国治理可能产生的影响的复杂性,并强调了提高我们对低于整体政治水平的职能合作的更间接影响的认识的重要性。查看全文下载全文关键字阿拉伯独裁政权,民主促进,目标冲突,欧盟,功能合作,水管理,more“,pubid:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.674363

著录项

  • 来源
    《Democratization》 |2012年第3期|p.575-601|共27页
  • 作者

    Tina Freyburgab*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:06:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号