首页> 外文期刊>Defence Studies >Thomas Hobbes as strategist
【24h】

Thomas Hobbes as strategist

机译:托马斯霍布斯作为战略家

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Hobbes' relevance to the concerns of strategy has gone unappreciated. He is, after all, interested in escaping the condition of war, rather than exploiting its political utility. And yet, exactly because of this, Leviathan addresses the principal difficulty with strategic deliberation - which is the epistemic deficit that attends human interaction, encouraging anticipatory violence. As the military theorist Carl von Clausewitz observed, minimizing the costs of war involves identifying opportunities for exercising mutual restraint over its conduct. And achieving this requires that the aforementioned epistemic deficit be ameliorated. For Hobbes, the sovereign state achieves this for its citizens; but he also considers other solutions in the context of relations between such states. The resulting insights are relevant to matters such as nuclear deterrence, and recent stability operations in the Middle East.
机译:霍布斯与战略担忧的相关性已经过于挪用。毕竟,他有兴趣逃避战争的条件,而不是利用其政治效用。然而,完全是因为这一点,Leviathan解决了战略审议的主要困难 - 这是出席人类互动的认知赤字,鼓励预期的暴力。由于观察到的军事理论家Carl von Clasewitz,最大限度地减少了战争成本涉及确定在其行为上行使互动的机会。实现这一目标要求上述认知缺陷更加好化。对于霍布斯而言,主权国家为其公民实现了这一点;但他还认为在这些国家之间的关系的背景下考虑其他解决方案。由此产生的见解与核威慑以及最近在中东的稳定行动等问题有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号