首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of Work, Environment & Health >One-year randomized controlled trial with different physical-activity programs to reduce musculoskeletal symptoms in the neck and shoulders among office workers
【24h】

One-year randomized controlled trial with different physical-activity programs to reduce musculoskeletal symptoms in the neck and shoulders among office workers

机译:一项为期一年的随机对照试验,采用了不同的体育锻炼计划,以减轻上班族颈部和肩膀的肌肉骨骼症状

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives This study evaluates the effect of two different worksite physical-activity interventions on neck-shoulder symptoms, together with perceived work ability and sick leave among office workers. Methods An examiner-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted with 549 office workers allocated to one of three intervention groups: one with specific resistance training (SRT) of the neck-shoulder region (N=180), one with all-round physical exercise (APE) (N=187), and one which acted as a reference group, which was informed about general health-promoting activities but did not include a physical activity program (N=182). Questionnaires were filled out at baseline and after 1 year of training. Results The duration and intensity of neck and shoulder symptoms was lower after the specified worksite physical-activity interventions than in the reference group. On an intervention group level, SRT was not more effective than APE in reducing the duration and intensity of neck and shoulder symptoms. However, those asymptomatic at baseline had a significant lower prevalence of neck-shoulder symptoms at follow-up when allocated to the SRT group than when placed in the APE group or reference group. At baseline the work ability index (WAI) was close to 90% of the maximum score, and the mean sick leave was 5 days per year, both being unaffected by the interventions. Conclusions Different physical-activity interventions were successful in reducing neck-shoulder symptoms, and SRT was superior to APE in the primary prevention of such symptoms. The initially relatively high WAI was the most probable reason for no further increase in WAI. Likewise the mean sick leave the year before the intervention was very low, and it was probably not possible to reduce it further.
机译:目的本研究评估了两种不同的工作场所体育锻炼干预措施对颈肩症状的影响,以及上班族的感知工作能力和病假。方法对549名上班族进行了一项研究者盲目随机对照试验,将其分为三个干预组之一:一个对颈肩区域进行特定抵抗训练(SRT)(N = 180),一个进行全面体育锻炼(N = 180)。 APE(N = 187),和一个作为参考小组的人,被告知有关促进健康的一般活动,但不包括体育锻炼计划(N = 182)。在基线和培训1年后填写问卷。结果在指定的工作场所进行体育锻炼后,颈部和肩部症状的持续时间和强度均低于参考组。在干预组的水平上,SRT在减少颈部和肩部症状的持续时间和强度方面没有比APE更有效。然而,基线时那些无症状的患者在分配给SRT组时,其随访时颈肩症状的患病率明显低于APE组或参考组。基线时,工作能力指数(WAI)接近最高分数的90%,平均病假为每年5天,均不受干预措施的影响。结论不同的体育锻炼干预措施可成功减轻肩颈症状,在预防此类症状方面,SRT优于APE。最初相对较高的WAI是WAI没有进一步提高的最可能原因。同样,干预前一年的平均病假很低,可能无法进一步减少病假。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号