首页> 外文期刊>Dao >Mou Zongsan and Tang Junyi on Zhang Zai’s and Wang Fuzhi’s Philosophies of Qi: A Critical Reflection
【24h】

Mou Zongsan and Tang Junyi on Zhang Zai’s and Wang Fuzhi’s Philosophies of Qi: A Critical Reflection

机译:M ouzo ng散and tang Jun一O年Zhang Z爱’sand Wang F U值’是philosophies o FQ i: A critical reflection

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As the founders of Contemporary Neo-Confucianism, Mou Zongsan and Tang Junyi developed different interpretations of Zhang Zai’s and Wang Fuzhi’s philosophies of qi. In this essay, both the strength and weakness of their interpretations will be critically examined. As a contrast, an alternative interpretation of the School of qi in Song-Ming Neo-Confucianism will be outlined. This new interpretation will uncover that, like Leibniz, Zhang Zai and Wang Fuzhi introduced a non-substantivalist approach in natural philosophy in terms of an innovative concept of force. This interpretation not only helps to show the limitations of Mou Zongsan’s and Tang Junyi’s understandings of Zhang Zai’s and Wang Fuzhi’s doctrines of qi, but also indicates a way to bridge the traditional Chinese philosophy of nature and modern physics. More generally, our critical discussions will bring to light a new angle with which to re-appreciate Mou Zongsan’s and Tang Junyi’s contributions to the development of Confucianism.
机译:作为当代新儒学的奠基人,牟宗三和唐俊义对张载和王夫之气哲学提出了不同的解释。在本文中,将严格审查其解释的优缺点。相比之下,将概述宋明理学中的气派的另一种解释。这种新的解释将揭示出,就像莱布尼兹,张载和王夫之一样,在创新性的力量概念方面引入了自然哲学中的非实体主义方法。这种解释不仅有助于显示牟宗三和唐俊义对张载和王夫之气学的理解的局限性,而且还为桥接中国传统自然哲学和现代物理学提供了一种途径。更笼统地说,我们的批判性讨论将揭示一个新的角度,以重新认识牟宗三和唐俊义对儒学发展的贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号