首页> 外文期刊>Cybernetics & Human Knowing >Biosemiotic Cosmogony of the Riddle of Life!
【24h】

Biosemiotic Cosmogony of the Riddle of Life!

机译:生命之谜的生物符号宇宙论!

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The book, edited and with a very instructive introduction by Vinicius and Fernandez, contains chapters by: Nathan Hauser; Ivo Ibri; Robert Lane; Elisio Fernandez; Menno Hulswit and Vinicius Roraanini; Vincent Colapietro; Lauro Fredrico Barbosa da Silveira and Maria Eunice Quilici Gonzales; Winfred Noth; John Collier; Joao Queiros, Frederik Stjernfelt, and Charbel Nino El-Hani; and, Vinicius Romanini-all contributing to the development of a more consistent and true Peircean foundation for biosemiotics. In my view this is one of the most philosophically remarkable publications in the Springer biosemiotics series. The subject choices and the quality of its contributions make it a delight to read, though it does not make for light reading. The book attacks the problem of how to make the best possible use of Peirce's new philosophical transdisciplinary framework in order to produce a paradigmatic background for biosemiotics, which does not really exist yet. The difficulty is biosemiotics's position between-or overlapping-the quantitative and the qualitative sciences as well as the natural, social, and human sciences. One of the big and very relevant problems in the many foundational years of biosemiotics-discussed with Marcello Barbieri who edited the first volume of the series-which still has not been solved is the problem of what it means to be scientific. For Barbieri-and many other well-established researchers in the natural sciences-to be scientific is to be able to give mechanistic model explanations and eventually extend them with dualist theories of codes and coding. In Brier (2015), I have recapitulated an aspect of this discussion and argued that this foundation is not enough. It does not even embrace a systems and cybernetic foundation. To be able to produce models of self-organization, as well as cognitive and communicative meaning processes, as explanations, we need triadic models. In this book the consequences for the foundations of a true triadic view of what the dynamism of the cosmos, living nature, culture, and mind means for biosemiotics is investigated from this quote from Peirce himself:
机译:该书由Vinicius和Fernandez编辑并作了非常有启发性的介绍,其中包含以下章节:Nathan Hauser;伊沃·伊布里(Ivo Ibri)罗伯特·莱恩Elisio Fernandez; Menno Hulswit和Vinicius Roraanini;文森特·科拉皮特罗(Vincent Colapietro) Lauro Fredrico Barbosa da Silveira和Maria Eunice Quilici Gonzales;温弗雷德·诺思;约翰·科利尔Joao Queiros,Frederik Stjernfelt和Charbel Nino El-Hani;还有Vinicius Romanini,所有这些都为Peercean生物符号学基础的发展提供了更加一致和真实的基础。在我看来,这是史宾格生物符号学系列中最具哲学意义的出版物之一。主题的选择及其贡献的质量使阅读变得很愉快,尽管它不能使阅读轻松。该书探讨了如何最大程度地利用皮尔士(Peirce)的新的哲学跨学科框架来产生生物符号学的范式背景的问题,而这实际上还不存在。困难在于生物符号学在定量科学和定性科学以及自然科学,社会科学和人文科学之间的地位,或相互重叠。在生物符号学的许多基础年中,与Marcello Barbieri讨论过的一个重大且非常相关的问题是编辑该系列的第一卷,至今仍未解决,这是科学意义的问题。对于巴比耶里(Barbieri)和其他许多自然科学界知名的研究人员而言,要使科学成为可能,就能够给出机械模型的解释,并最终将它们扩展为编码和编码的二元论。在Brier(2015)中,我总结了这一讨论的一个方面,并认为仅此基础是不够的。它甚至不包含系统和控制论的基础。为了能够产生自我组织的模型以及认知和交流的意义过程作为解释,我们需要三元模型。在这本书中,根据皮尔士本人的这句话,研究了关于宇宙动力,生命本质,文化和思想对生物符号学的意义的真正三合会观点基础的后果:

著录项

  • 来源
    《Cybernetics & Human Knowing》 |2016年第4期|85-91|共7页
  • 作者

    Soren Brier;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:27:27

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号