...
首页> 外文期刊>Current Pharmaceutical Design >Editorial [Hot Topic: Spinal Cord Injury and Repair - Part I (Executive Editor: Weihong Pan)]
【24h】

Editorial [Hot Topic: Spinal Cord Injury and Repair - Part I (Executive Editor: Weihong Pan)]

机译:社论[热门话题:脊髓损伤与修复-第一部分(执行编辑:潘伟宏)]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is followed by a series of dynamic changes in the injured spinal cord and the environment that influence the extent of structural and functional recovery. All therapeutic interventions work toward one goal: to restore balance in the spinal cord by promoting regenerative pathways and depressing the degenerative factors (Fig. 1). Caution comes from awareness that acute effects are not always sustained enough to lead to long-term restoration of spinal cord function, and that experimental results from animal models do not always translate into clinical success in injured people. Nonetheless, rapid progress has been seen in the past two decades in the research and pharmaceutical intervention required to repair the spinal cord. This Special Issue presents some of the major approaches.nnIn the leading article, Tsai and Tator highlight the various paths toward a cure for SCI. The neuroprotective strategies include the use steroids and other anti-inflammatory agents as well as agents that are anti-ischemic, that antagonize glutamate excitoxicity, that are anti-apopototic, and that enhance axonal function [1]. The regenerative strategies are designed to overcome the inhibitory factors, create a regeneration-inducing environment with implants of synthetic or biological matrices, supplement neurotrophic factors, and transplant cells and tissue. The benefits and shortcomings of these approaches are discussed. This serves as an excellent introduction to the next group of reviews that addresses some of the specific areas.nnSCI is associated with primary and secondary pathology. The role of inflammation and immune reactions in tissue repair is no doubt crucial. Contrary to the conventional wisdom that inflammation is universally deleterious, accumulating evidence presented by Popovich and others indicates that inflammatory cells and mediators may facilitate endogenous repair processes when applied in adequate concentrations at the appropriate time. In this issue, Jones, McDaniel, and Popovich review the multiple faces and players involved in inflammatory-mediated injury and repair [2]. By contrast, cell elimination, as induced by radiation therapy, has been shown to significantly improve histological and electrophysiological parameters after contusion SCI in the rat [3]. In her review, Kalderon not only provides convincing results but also summarizes the window of opportunity, the principles of radiotherapy, and the involvement of the blood-brain and blood-spinal cord barrier (BBB) in the process. Also related to BBB function with specific emphasis on the transport systems for neurotrophic and inflammatory cytokines, Kastin and Pan stress potential strategies against myelin-associated growth inhibitory factors [4]. These approaches target the inhibitory molecules themselves, their NgR receptor, and intracellular pathways. In parallel, Phinney and Isakova discuss progress in the use of bone marrow - derived mesenchymal stem cells to promote regeneration. The history, derivatization, differentiation, technical expertise, as well as therapeutic effects of these mesenchymal stem cells are described in fine detail [5]. Further, Xiang, Pan, and Kastin [6] discuss some general mechanisms involved in spinal cord repair, serving to contrast and complement the strategies proposed by Tsai and Tator at the beginning of the Issue.nnThis concludes the first half of the Special Issue.
机译:脊髓损伤(SCI)之后是脊髓损伤和周围环境的一系列动态变化,这些动态变化会影响结构和功能恢复的程度。所有治疗性干预都朝着一个目标努力:通过促进再生途径和抑制退化因素来恢复脊髓的平衡(图1)。出于警惕,人们意识到急性作用并不总是能持续导致脊髓功能长期恢复,而且动物模型的实验结果并不总是能在受伤的人中取得临床成功。然而,在过去的二十年中,在修复脊髓所需的研究和药物干预中已经看到了快速的进展。本特刊介绍了一些主要方法。nn在主要文章中,Tsai和Tator强调了治愈SCI的各种途径。神经保护策略包括使用类固醇和其他抗炎药以及抗局部缺血,拮抗谷氨酸兴奋性,抗凋亡和增强轴突功能的药物[1]。再生策略旨在克服抑制因素,用合成或生物基质植入物创造诱导再生的环境,补充神经营养因子,以及移植细胞和组织。讨论了这些方法的优点和缺点。这是对处理某些特定领域的下一组综述的出色介绍。nnSCI与主要和次要病理相关。炎症和免疫反应在组织修复中的作用无疑至关重要。与通常认为炎症是有害的传统看法相反,Popovich等人提供的越来越多的证据表明,在适当的时间以适当的浓度使用时,炎症细胞和介质可能会促进内源性修复过程。在本期杂志中,Jones,McDaniel和Popovich回顾了涉及炎症介导的损伤和修复的多个面孔和参与者[2]。相比之下,放射治疗诱导的细胞消除已显示可显着改善大鼠挫伤性脊髓损伤后的组织学和电生理参数[3]。在她的评论中,卡尔德隆不仅提供了令人信服的结果,而且还总结了机会之窗,放射疗法的原理以及在此过程中血脑和血脊髓屏障(BBB)的参与。也与血脑屏障功能有关,特别着重于神经营养和炎性细胞因子的转运系统,Kastin和Pan应对髓鞘相关生长抑制因子的潜在策略[4]。这些方法靶向抑制分子本身,其NgR受体和细胞内途径。同时,Phinney和Isakova讨论了使用骨髓来源的间充质干细胞促进再生的研究进展。这些间充质干细胞的历史,衍生,分化,技术专长以及治疗效果均已详细描述[5]。此外,Xiang,Pan和Kastin [6]讨论了一些涉及脊髓修复的一般机制,旨在对比和补充Tsai和Tator在本期开始时提出的策略。nn至此,本期上半期结束。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号