...
首页> 外文期刊>Current opinion in environmental sustainability >Glocal forest and REDD+ governance: win-win or lose-lose?
【24h】

Glocal forest and REDD+ governance: win-win or lose-lose?

机译:Glocal森林和REDD +治理:双赢还是输输?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Global forest governance is moving incrementally forward. REDD+ is the latest forest instrument being promoted globally as a cost-effective mechanism. This paper addresses the question: Does a glocal (global to local to global) analysis of forest policies lead to the conclusion that REDD+ can deliver a win-win situation as proponents claim? Using a literature review and focusing on four countries, this paper argues that REDD+ can potentially address deforestation and climate change by mobilizing financial and human resources, and help developed countries through cost-effective measures and developing countries by channeling resources to them. However, there is a risk that REDD+ may become a 'lose-lose' instrument leading to irreversible commodification and tradeability of forests, exacerbating North-South conflicts, and marginalizing local communities.
机译:全球森林治理正在逐步向前发展。 REDD +是作为具有成本效益的机制在全球范围内推广的最新森林工具。本文解决了一个问题:对森林政策的全球(全球到本地再到全球)分析是否得出结论,如支持者所言,REDD +可以实现双赢?本文使用文献综述并关注四个国家,认为REDD +可以通过动员财政和人力资源来解决森林砍伐和气候变化的问题,并可以通过成本有效的措施帮助发达国家,以及通过向发展中国家提供资源来帮助发展中国家。但是,REDD +可能会成为导致森林商品无法商品化和不可交易性的“输输”工具,加剧南北冲突,并使当地社区边缘化。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者

    Joyeeta Gupta;

  • 作者单位

    Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号