...
首页> 外文期刊>Current Medicinal Chemistry >Advances in Iron Overload Therapies. Prospects for Effective Use of Deferiprone (L1), Deferoxamine, the New Experimental Chelators ICL670, GT56-252, L1NAll and their Combinations
【24h】

Advances in Iron Overload Therapies. Prospects for Effective Use of Deferiprone (L1), Deferoxamine, the New Experimental Chelators ICL670, GT56-252, L1NAll and their Combinations

机译:铁超负荷疗法的进展。有效使用去铁酮(L1),去铁胺,新型实验性螯合剂ICL670,GT56-252,L1NAll及其组合的前景

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Effective new therapies and mechanisms have been developed for the targeting and prevention of iron overload and toxicity in thalassaemia and idiopathic haemochromatosis patients. A new era in the development of chelating drugs began with the introduction of deferiprone or L1, which as a monotherapy or in combination with deferoxamine can be used universally for effective chelation treatments, rapid iron removal, maintenance of low iron stores and prevention of heart and other organ damage caused by iron overload. Several experimental iron chelators such as deferasirox (4-[3,5-bis (2-hydroxyphenyl)-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl]-benzoic acid) or ICL670, deferitrin (4,5-dihydro-2- (2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-4 (S)-carboxylic acid) or GT56- 252, 1-allyl-2-methyl-3-hydroxypyrid-4-one or L1NAll and starch deferoxamine polymers have reached different stages of clinical development. The lipophilic ICL670, which can only be administered once daily is generally ineffective in causing negative iron balance but is effective in reducing liver iron. It is suspected that it may increase iron absorption and the redistribution of iron from the liver to the heart and other organs. The experimental iron chelators do not appear to have significant advantages in efficacy and toxicity by comparison to deferiprone, deferoxamine or their combination. However, the prospect of combination therapies using deferiprone, deferoxamine and new chelators will provide new mechanisms of chelator interactions, which may lead to higher efficacy and lower toxicity by comparison to monotherapies. A major disadvantage of the experimental chelators is that even if they are approved for clinical use, they are unlikely to be as inexpensive as deferiprone and become available to the vast majority of thalassaemia patients, who live in developing countries.
机译:已经开发出有效的新疗法和机制,用于针对和预防地中海贫血和特发性血色素沉着病患者的铁超载和毒性。螯合剂开发的新纪元始于引入去铁酮或L1,它可以作为单一疗法或与去铁胺联合使用,普遍用于有效的螯合治疗,快速除铁,维持低铁含量并预防心脏和心脏疾病。铁过载造成的其他器官损害。几种实验性铁螯合剂,如地拉罗司(4- [3,5-双(2-羟苯基)-1,2,4-三唑-1-基]-苯甲酸)或ICL670,去铁蛋白(4,5-二氢-2 -(2,4-二羟基苯基)-4-甲基噻唑-4(S)-羧酸)或GT56-252、1-烯丙基-2-甲基-3-羟基吡啶-4-酮或L1NAll和淀粉去铁胺聚合物已达到不同临床发展阶段。亲脂性ICL670(每天只能给药一次)通常在引起负铁平衡方面无效,但对减少肝铁有效。怀疑它可能会增加铁的吸收以及铁从肝脏向心脏和其他器官的重新分布。与去铁酮,去铁胺或其组合相比,实验性铁螯合剂在功效和毒性方面似乎没有明显的优势。然而,使用去铁酮,去铁胺和新的螯合剂的联合疗法的前景将提供螯合剂相互作用的新机制,与单一疗法相比,可导致更高的疗效和更低的毒性。实验性螯合剂的主要缺点是,即使它们被批准用于临床,它们也不可能像去铁酮一样便宜,并不能供生活在发展中国家的绝大多数地中海贫血患者使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号