首页> 外文期刊>Cultural Studies >THE PRIMACY OF THE POLITICAL AND THE TROPE OF THE ‘PEOPLE’ IN ERNESTO LACLAU'S ON POPULIST REASON
【24h】

THE PRIMACY OF THE POLITICAL AND THE TROPE OF THE ‘PEOPLE’ IN ERNESTO LACLAU'S ON POPULIST REASON

机译:厄内斯托·拉克劳的民粹主义原因是政治的主宰和“人民”的陷阱

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

If the proliferation of new social movements thematized in Hegemony and Socialist Strategy was the key conjectural feature on the horizon of radical democratic politics in Euro-America in 1980s, the eruptions of the people in the streets and slums all over the world, and especially in the global south, is hauntingly present in the background of On Populist Reason. With the democratic imaginary now gone global, Laclau's positing of the people as the political subject par excellence and populism as the paradigmatic logic of the political acquires new pertinence. This double privileging is accompanied by a series of shifts in emphasis in the conceptual architecture of Laclau's theory of hegemony. Aside from the further radicalization two pivotal terms in Laclau's social ontology - heterogeneity and contingency - one can observe three other noticeable shifts in emphasis: First, on the plane of discursivity (or in the differential field of the meaningful) the articulatory practices are increasingly characterized in terms of their rhetoricity (i.e. the mode of braiding the rhetorical form with its function); and, furthermore, the tropological characterization of the articulatory practices progressively yields to an analysis of their performative emergence by way of ‘naming’. Second, there is a corresponding shift in the analytic interest from the discursive production of the nodal points (such as ‘free market’ or ‘law and order’) to the discursive production of empty signifiers (especially, of the ‘people’). Third, the conflictual social field is configured not only in terms of antagonisms but also in terms of dislocations.View full textDownload full textKeywordsheterogeneity, contingency, antagonisms, naming, the political, the institution of the socialRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2011.636187
机译:如果说以霸权主义和社会主义战略为主题的新社会运动的泛滥是1980年代欧美激进民主政治的主要猜想特征,那么世界各地,尤其是在街头和贫民窟的人们的爆发在“民粹主义理性”的背景下,全球南部一直困扰着人们。如今,随着民主假想的全球化,拉克劳将人民作为政治学主题的地位和将民粹主义视为政治学的范式逻辑的假设获得了新的关注。这种双重特权伴随着对拉克劳霸权理论的概念架构的一系列关注转移。除了进一步激进化之外,拉克劳社会本体论中的两个关键术语-异质性和偶然性-一个可以观察到的重点的其他三个明显变化:首先,在话语平面上(或在有意义的不同领域中),交往行为越来越具有特征性。就其修辞学而言(即将修辞形式与其功能编织在一起的方式);而且,通过“命名”的方式,对发音练习的形态学特征进行逐步分析,以分析其表演性出现。其次,分析兴趣从节点的离散化生产(例如“自由市场”或“法律与秩序”)到空的指示符的离散化生产(尤其是对空的指示符的转化)有相应的转变。 “人民”)。第三,冲突社会领域不仅在对抗方面而且还在错位方面进行配置。查看全文下载全文关键词遗传,偶然性,对立,命名,政治,社会制度相关的变量var addthis_config = {弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2011.636187

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号