首页> 外文期刊>Cultural Studies >SCALING GOVERNMENTALITY
【24h】

SCALING GOVERNMENTALITY

机译:标度政府

获取原文
       

摘要

This article explores contemporary uses of museum co-production for public policy through a sustained theoretical engagement with Tony Bennett's work on museums as an ‘object of government’. The specific focus is a theoretical discussion of the ‘logic of culture’ as it relates to new UK policy uses of participants' ‘experience’ as the desired site of authenticity at the very same time as the process of expressing this authenticity is located as a site for reform. It is argued that Bennett mobilizes two techniques of scale (fixing the analytic lens of governmentality and drawing on a strong scalar correspondence of power) in order to secure a relatively disciplinary reading of governmentality and to foreclose the resistant possibilities of cultural politics. Drawing on the differences between practices associated in UK museums with ‘access’ (which works through the dis-intensification of the difference between the museum and everyday life) and with ‘social impact’ (which requires a re-intensification of this difference in order to increase the visibility of effect), this article concludes by countering Bennett's more disciplinary uses of Foucault with the Foucault of ‘The Subject and Power’. It is argued that the ‘logic of culture’ can be calibrated to varying intensities in considering the coming-into-relationship between the museums and those-to-be-involved. It is specifically argued - following Foucault's spatializaton of ‘thought’ as distance (limit-attitude) and ‘counter-conduct’ as proximity - that the ‘logic of culture’ might be actively re-calibrated to use the spatialized dynamic of distance and proximity to create spaces which might allow the museum and its associated policy - not just those involved - to be affected by the co-production encounter.View full textDownload full textKeywordsmuseums, governmentality, Cultural Studies, cultural policy, co-production, community engagementRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2012.679285
机译:本文通过与托尼·班尼特(Tony Bennett)在博物馆方面的工作(作为“政府对象”)进行持续的理论互动,探讨了博物馆联合生产在公共政策中的当代用途。具体的焦点是对“文化逻辑”的理论讨论,因为它与在表达过程的同时,将参与者的“体验”作为英国真实性的理想场所的新英国政策使用有关。这种真实性可作为改革的场所。有人认为,贝内特动员了两种规模化技术(固定了政府性的分析镜头,并利用了强大的标量权力对应),以确保对政府性有相对的学科解读,并排除了文化政治的抵制可能性。利用英国博物馆相关的做法之间的差异,即“获取”(通过加剧博物馆与日常生活之间的差异来进行工作)和“社会影响”(需要重新进行)。为了增加效果的可见性,这种差异的加剧),本文通过以“主题与权力”的福柯反抗贝内特对福柯的更多纪律使用来得出结论。有人认为,“文化逻辑”可以在考虑博物馆与相关博物馆之间的关系时,根据不同的强度进行校准。特别指出的是-按照福柯的“思想”作为距离(极限-高度)的空间化和“反行为”作为接近性的空间化之后,“文化逻辑”可能会被积极地重新校准。利用距离和接近度的空间动态来创建空间,这可能会使博物馆及其相关政策-不仅仅是参与其中的政策-受到共同制作遭遇的影响。查看全文下载全文关键字博物馆,政府,文化研究,文化政策,共同制作,社区参与相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid:“ ra -4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2012.679285

著录项

  • 来源
    《Cultural Studies》 |2012年第4期|p.565-592|共28页
  • 作者

    Helen Graham;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:04:38

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号