首页> 外文期刊>Cultural Trends >The “scouse wedding” and other myths: reflections on the evolution of a “Liverpool model” for culture-led urban regeneration
【24h】

The “scouse wedding” and other myths: reflections on the evolution of a “Liverpool model” for culture-led urban regeneration

机译:“残酷的婚礼”和其他神话:对“利物浦模型”演变的反思,以文化为主导的城市复兴

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper considers the development of a “Liverpool model” for culture-led urban regeneration, based on an analysis of the competition to become the UK's first City of Culture (UKCC) for 2013. The paper outlines New Labour's developing approach to culture-led regeneration, placing the UKCC in the context of the use of culture for various local development policies, particularly city branding and urban regeneration (Evans & Shaw, 2004; McGuigan, 2005). Within this context, the paper considers how Liverpool's year as European Capital of Culture (ECoC) 2008 has been narrated by New Labour and the manner in which this narrative has influenced the development of the UKCC programme (Department for Culture, Media and Sport [DCMS], 2009; Garcia, Melville & Cox, 2010). The paper demonstrates how this narrative overlooks the ultimate specificity of Liverpool's success (Liverpool Culture Company, 2009; Garcia et al., 2010), which suggests a unique combination of political circumstance, cultural leadership and public and private investment are at the root of the perceived success of Liverpool's ECoC 2008, rather than an exportable, replicable policy (O'Brien & Miles, 2010) described by the policy literature, and substantiated by the competition to select the UKCC 2013 (DCMS, 2009). The paper's conclusion problematises the prospect of another city repeating the Liverpool experience. The “Liverpool model” of culture-led regeneration is shown as one which limits prospective cultural policies to a narrow vision of the possible, a vision which is unlikely to be sustainable in the foreseeable future.View full textDownload full textKeywordsculture-led urban regeneration, local development policies, city branding, urban regeneration, European Capital of Culture, Liverpool 08Related var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2012.674749
机译:本文在分析2013年成为英国首个文化城市(UKCC)的竞争的基础上,考虑了以文化为主导的城市复兴的“利物浦模型”的发展。本文概述了新工党的发展方法以文化为主导的再生,使UKCC处于将文化用于各种地方发展政策的环境中,特别是城市品牌和城市再生(Evans&Shaw,2004; McGuigan,2005)。在此背景下,本文考虑了新工党如何描述利物浦作为2008年欧洲文化之都(ECoC)的年份,以及该叙述方式对UKCC计划(文化,媒体和体育系[DCMS] ],2009年;加西亚,梅尔维尔和考克斯(2010年)。本文证明了这种叙述是如何忽视了利物浦成功的最终特殊性(利物浦文化公司,2009年;加西亚等人,2010年),这表明政治环境,文化领导力以及公共和私人投资的独特结合才是利物浦成功的根源。认为利物浦的ECoC 2008取得了成功,而不是政策文献中描述的可出口,可复制的政策(O'Brien&Miles,2010),并获得了选择UKCC 2013的竞争的支持(DCMS,2009)。该论文的结论使另一个城市重复利物浦经历的前景感到困惑。以文化为主导的再生的“利物浦模型”被显示为将预期的文化政策限制在一个狭vision的可能性范围内,这种视野在可预见的未来不太可能持续。查看全文下载全文关键字城市更新,地方发展政策,城市品牌,城市更新,欧洲文化之都,利物浦08相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook, stumbleupon,digg,google,more“,pubid:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2012.674749

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号