...
首页> 外文期刊>Cryptography and Communications >Security of BLS and BGLS signatures in a multi-user setting
【24h】

Security of BLS and BGLS signatures in a multi-user setting

机译:多用户设置中BLS和BGLS签名的安全性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

AbstractTraditional single-user security models do not necessarily capture the power of real-world attackers. A scheme that is secure in the single-user setting may not be as secure in the multi-user setting. Inspired by the recent analysis of Schnorr signatures in the multi-user setting, we analyse Boneh-Lynn-Shacham (BLS) signatures and Boneh-Gentry-Lynn-Shacham (BGLS) aggregate signatures in the multi-user setting. We obtain a tight reduction from the security of key-prefixed BLS in the multi-user model to normal BLS in the single-user model. We introduce a multi-user security model for general aggregate signature schemes, in contrast to the original “chosen-key” security model of BGLS that is analogous to the single-user setting of a signature scheme. We obtain a tight reduction from the security of multi-user key-prefixed BGLS to the security of multi-user key-prefixed BLS. Finally, we apply a technique of Katz and Wang to present a tight security reduction from a variant of multi-user key-prefixed BGLS to the computational co-Diffie-Hellman (co-CDH) problem. All of our results for BLS and BGLS use type III pairings.
机译: Abstract 传统的单用户安全模型不一定能够捕获现实世界的攻击者的能力。在单用户设置中安全的方案在多用户设置中可能不那么安全。受多用户设置中对Schnorr签名的最新分析的启发,我们分析了多用户设置中的Boneh-Lynn-Shacham(BLS)签名和Boneh-Gentry-Lynn-Shacham(BGLS)聚合签名。我们从多用户模型中的密钥前缀BLS的安全性严格降低到单用户模型中的普通BLS的安全性。与BGLS的原始“选择密钥”安全模型(类似于签名方案的单用户设置)相比,我们引入了用于一般聚合签名方案的多用户安全模型。从多用户密钥前缀的BGLS的安全性到多用户密钥前缀BLS的安全性,我们得到了严格的降低。最后,我们应用了Katz和Wang的技术来提出从多用户密钥前缀BGLS的变体到计算共Diffie-Hellman(co-CDH)问题的严格安全性降低。我们对BLS和BGLS的所有结果都使用III型配对。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号