首页> 外文期刊>Crop and Pasture Science >Spray-topping annual grass pasture with glyphosate to delay loss of feeding value during summer. IV. Diet composition, herbage intake, and performance in grazing sheep
【24h】

Spray-topping annual grass pasture with glyphosate to delay loss of feeding value during summer. IV. Diet composition, herbage intake, and performance in grazing sheep

机译:用草甘膦喷洒一年生草牧场,以延缓夏季草食价值的损失。 IV。日粮组成,牧草摄入量和放牧绵羊的生产性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We report the effects of spray-topping annual grass pasture with glyphosate (180 g a.i./ha as Roundup CT, at the seed head emergence stage) on the nutritive value of herbage and on subsequent performance of grazing sheep. Eight 1-ha plots, consisting of 4 sprayed and 4 unsprayed (control) plots, were set-stocked with Merino wethers (18 months old, 12 sheep/ha) from 8 days after anthesis in the control plots (late spring) until 165 days after anthesis (mid-autumn). In 4 periods (15–20, 36–41, 71–76, and 99–104 days after anthesis; Periods 1–4, respectively) sheep were dosed with synthetic alkanes and herbage and faecal samples were taken, in order to estimate diet composition (in terms of plant parts), faecal output, herbage intake, and the digestibility of the whole diet. As described in our earlier papers, spray-topping reduced the yield of pasture dry matter, but also slowed the loss of water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and digestibility during pasture senescence. The present paper shows that as a result, sheep grazing sprayed herbage in Periods 1 and 2 consumed significantly more organic matter (OM) and digestible OM (DOM) than sheep grazing the control pasture. Their diet contained a higher proportion of stem with a higher WSC concentration than that of the sheep grazing the control plots. The proportions of different plant parts (leaf blade+sheath, stem, seed head) in the diet of both the plot sheep and oesophageally fistulated (OF) sheep, which grazed treatments for short periods, differed significantly between treatments in all periods. However, the compositions of the diets selected by plot and OF sheep were similar. These results confirmed diet preferences measured using housed sheep and demonstrate the usefulness of alkane-based procedures for quantifying diet composition and intake in grazing animals. As a result of their higher intake of DOM, sheep grazing sprayed herbage had a significantly higher liveweight gain over the first 2 periods (40 g/day). In Period 3, sheep grazing sprayed herbage consumed more OM than sheep grazing control herbage. However, DOM intakes from sprayed or control plots were not significantly different in either Period 3 or Period 4, and were lower than in Periods 1 and 2. Sheep grazing both treatments lost liveweight at a similar rate over this time. Wool growth in sheep grazing sprayed herbage was improved by 10% during the experimental period; wool strength was also improved significantly. The implications for the management of sheep grazing spray-topped pastures over summer are discussed.
机译:我们报告了使用草甘膦(180 g a.i./ha作为Roundup CT,在种子头出苗阶段)对一年生草场进行喷洒对牧草的营养价值以及随后放牧绵羊的影响。在对照样地开花后的第8天(春季末)至165天,共放养8个1公顷样地,其中包括4个喷雾样地和4个非喷雾样(对照)样地,并配以美利奴羊奶(18个月大,12只绵羊/公顷)。花后几天(中秋)。在4个时期(花后15–20、36–41、71–76和99–104天;分别为1–4天)中,给绵羊服用合成烷烃并采集草料和粪便样本,以估计饮食成分(就植物部位而言),粪便产量,草料摄入量和整个饮食的消化率。如我们之前的论文所述,喷洒喷洒降低了牧场干物质的产量,但也减缓了牧场衰老过程中水溶性碳水化合物(WSC)的流失和消化率。本文表明,结果是,放牧绵羊在第1和第2阶段喷洒的牧草比放牧对照牧场的绵羊消耗了更多的有机质(OM)和可消化的OM(DOM)。他们的日粮中所含茎的比例较高,WSC浓度也高于放牧对照样地的绵羊。在短时期内放牧处理的地块绵羊和食道f裂(OF)绵羊的饮食中,不同植物部分(叶片+鞘,茎,种子头)的比例在所有时期之间均存在显着差异。但是,通过小区和OF绵羊选择的日粮组成是相似的。这些结果证实了使用圈养绵羊测得的饮食偏爱,并证明了基于烷烃的方法可用于量化放牧动物的饮食组成和摄入量。由于其较高的DOM摄入量,绵羊放牧喷洒的牧草在前两个时期(40克/天)具有明显更高的体重增加。在第3阶段,放牧绵羊喷洒的牧草比放牧绵羊的牧草消耗更多的OM。但是,在第3期或第4期中,喷洒或对照样地的DOM摄入量均无显着差异,并且低于第1期和第2期。放牧绵羊的两种方法在此期间的体重减轻速率相似。在实验期间,绵羊放牧喷洒的牧草的羊毛生长提高了10%;羊毛强度也显着提高。讨论了夏季对放牧喷顶牧场的绵羊的管理意义。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Crop and Pasture Science》 |1999年第4期|p.487-496|共10页
  • 作者单位

    AInstitute of Integrated Agricultural Development, Agriculture Victoria, RMB 1145,Rutherglen, Vic. 3685, Australia.BPresent address: The Institute of Land and Food Resources, The University of Melbourne,Parkville, Vic. 3052, Australia.CPresent address: 573 Wyse St, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia.DThe Institute of Land and Food Resources, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3052, Australia.EPresent address: Department of Physiology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.FPresent address: CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.GCSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.HCorresponding author;

    email: h.dove@pi.csiro.au;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    alkanes, digestibility, liveweight gain, wool growth.;

    机译:烷烃;消化率;活重增加;羊毛生长。;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号