...
首页> 外文期刊>Crop and Pasture Science >Yellow lupin (Lupinus luteus) tolerates waterlogging better than narrow-leafed lupin (L. angustifolius) IV. Root genotype is more important than shoot genotype
【24h】

Yellow lupin (Lupinus luteus) tolerates waterlogging better than narrow-leafed lupin (L. angustifolius) IV. Root genotype is more important than shoot genotype

机译:黄羽扇豆(Lupinus luteus)比窄叶羽扇豆(L. angustifolius)对水淹的耐受性更好。根基因型比芽基因型更重要

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

To understand how yellow lupin tolerates waterlogging better than narrow-leafed lupin, we investigated the roles of the roots and the shoots of these species. Reciprocal- and self-grafted combinations (scion = shoot/rootstock) of yellow and narrow-leafed lupin were made at the 2-leaf stage and waterlogged 45 days later (8–10 leaf stage). Responses to waterlogging were examined at the end of waterlogging and following a recovery period of 14 days.Waterlogging of reciprocal and self-grafted plants reduced total plant dry weight by 15–58% compared with non-waterlogged controls. These reductions were greater when the rootstock was narrow-leafed rather than yellow lupin, and were similar for the roots and shoots. Waterlogging increased dry weight of hypocotyl roots in most grafting combinations (by 2–19-fold), but grafts with narrow-leafed lupin scions produced almost twice the hypocotyl root length of grafts with yellow lupin scions. During the waterlogging period, leaf gas exchange decreased by 16–74% in all grafting combinations except in narrow-leafed lupin scion/yellow lupin rootstock where it increased by 17–30%. During waterlogging, stem water potential decreased and leaf osmotic pressure increased. These changes compensated one another and consequently there was no effect on bulk leaf turgor. After 14 days recovery, water relations returned to initial values.nnTolerance of the whole plant to waterlogging was influenced more by the root genotype than the shoot genotype. However, production of hypocotyl roots in response to waterlogging was related to the shoot genotype rather than the root genotype.
机译:为了了解黄色羽扇豆如何比窄叶羽扇豆更耐涝,我们调查了这些物种的根和芽的作用。黄色和阔叶羽扇豆的互作和自嫁接组合(接穗=茎/砧木)在两叶阶段进行,45天后浸水(8-10叶阶段)。在淹水结束时和恢复14天后,检查了对淹水的响应。与未淹水的对照相比,互生和自移植植物的淹水使植物总干重减少了15-58%。当砧木为窄叶而不是黄色羽扇豆时,这些减少幅度更大,并且对于根和茎则相似。在大多数嫁接组合中,涝渍会增加下胚轴根的干重(增加2到19倍),但是带有窄叶羽扇豆接穗的嫁接产生的下胚轴根长度几乎是带有黄色羽扇豆接穗的嫁接的胚轴根长度的两倍。在涝渍时期,除窄叶羽扇豆接穗/黄色羽扇豆砧木外,所有嫁接组合的叶片气体交换量减少了16%至74%,而后者增加了17%至30%。在渍水期间,茎水势降低,叶片渗透压升高。这些变化相互弥补,因此对散叶膨大没有影响。恢复14天后,水分关系恢复到初始值。nn整个基因型对涝渍的耐受性受根基因型的影响比对芽基因型的影响更大。然而,响应涝渍的下胚轴根的产生与枝条基因型有关,而不是与根基因型有关。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Crop and Pasture Science》 |2000年第6期|p.729-736|共8页
  • 作者单位

    APlant Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6907, Australia.B CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.C CRC for Legumes in Mediterranean Agriculture (CLIMA), The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA6907, Australia.D Agriculture Western Australia, Locked Bag No. 4, Bentley Delivery Centre, WA 6983, Australia.E Corresponding author;

    email: chrisdav@cyllene.uwa.edu.au;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    reciprocal grafting, leaf gas exchange, water relations, dry matter production.;

    机译:相互嫁接;叶片气体交换;水分关系;干物质生产。;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号