...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical Public Health >What is needed for health promotion in Africa: band-aid, live aid or real change?
【24h】

What is needed for health promotion in Africa: band-aid, live aid or real change?

机译:在非洲促进健康需要什么:创可贴,生活援助或真正的改变?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Health Promotion in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is currently facing many difficult challenges. Health status is worse than in any other region, with the midpoint data indicating that that SSA is not on track to achieve any of the Millenium Development Goals. This paper explores the history of health promotion in Africa, from before Alma Ata, through the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s, and up to the present. Using examples from Mozambique, Zimbabwe and South Africa during their transitional periods, and health promotion approaches adopted to tackle HIV/AIDS, diarrhoea and non-communicable diseases, the paper shows how the focus has shifted away from the ideals of the Ottawa Charter to an individualistic behaviour change approach. The reasons for the shift reflect political choices of governments that have favoured technocratic approaches over harnessing the popular mobilisations that have accompanied national struggles. The experiences of global movements, such as the Global Equity Gauge Alliance are considered as a way of enhancing local health promotion initiatives which, as presently conceived, are limited in their ability to address equity and the broader determinants of ill health.
机译:撒哈拉以南非洲地区(SSA)的健康促进目前面临许多困难的挑战。健康状况比任何其他地区都要差,中点数据表明,SSA不能实现任何千年发展目标。本文探讨了从阿尔玛·阿塔(Alma Ata)到1970年代,1980年代和1990年代直至现在的非洲促进健康的历史。利用莫桑比克,津巴布韦和南非过渡时期的例子,以及为应对艾滋病毒/艾滋病,腹泻和非传染性疾病而采取的健康促进方法,该论文表明了重点已从《渥太华宪章》的理想转向了个人主义行为改变方法。发生这种转变的原因反映了政府的政治选择,这些政府倾向于采用技术官僚主义的方法,而不是利用伴随国家斗争的民众动员。全球运动的经验,例如全球平等标准联盟,被认为是加强地方健康促进举措的一种方式,目前认为,这些举措在解决公平问题和影响健康的更广泛决定因素方面受到限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号