...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical Asian Studies >U.S. COURT RULES IN THE “OKINAWA DUGONG” CASE
【24h】

U.S. COURT RULES IN THE “OKINAWA DUGONG” CASE

机译:美国在“冲绳都贡”案中的法院规则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In January 2008, a U.S. federal court in San Francisco ruled that the U.S. Defense Department's plans to construct a new U.S. offshore Marine airbase in Okinawa violated the National Historic Preservation Act by not protecting a Japanese “national monument,” the endangered Okinawa dugong. This article discusses the background and trajectory of the lawsuit and the implications of this judgment. The outcome of this lawsuit is expected to improve processes of evaluating and managing environmental and other social impacts of U.S. military forces on hosting communities in Okinawa/Japan. The case also demonstrates the potential of transnational civil society actors to overcome a deficient democratic system within one state. The expanded theater of the anti-base Okinawans' protest brought them new allies while avoiding difficult and unnecessary conflict on the ground at home.
机译:2008年1月,美国旧金山联邦法院裁定,美国国防部在冲绳建造新的美国海上海军空军基地的计划违反了《国家历史保护法》,因为它不保护濒临灭绝的冲绳儒艮的日本“国家纪念碑”。本文讨论了诉讼的背景和轨迹以及此判决的含义。预计该诉讼的结果将改善评估和管理美国军事力量对日本冲绳县收容社区的环境及其他社会影响的过程。该案还表明,跨国公民社会行为者有可能克服一个国家内部民主制度的缺陷。反基地冲绳人抗议活动的扩大战场为他们带来了新的盟友,同时避免了在家中发生的困难和不必要的冲突。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号