首页> 外文期刊>Criminal Law and Philosophy >Habeas Corpus as Jus Cogens in International Law
【24h】

Habeas Corpus as Jus Cogens in International Law

机译:Habeas语料库在国际法中作为Jus Cogens

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

For hundreds of years procedural rights such as habeas corpus have been regarded as fundamental in the Anglo-American system of jurisprudence. In contemporary international law, fundamental norms are called jus cogens. Jus cogens norms are rights or rules that can not be derogated even by treaty. In the list that is often given, jus cogens norms include norms against aggression, apartheid, slavery, and genocide. All of the members of this list are substantive rights. In this paper I will argue that some procedural rights, crucial for the fair functioning of criminal proceedings, such as habeas corpus, should also have the status of jus cogens norms. I will begin by explaining what it means for a right to have jus cogens status. And I will follow this with a defense of having procedural rights like habeas corpus added to the list of jus cogens norms. I will then rehearse some of the debates about the jus cogens status of procedural rights in the European Commission on Human Rights. At the end of this paper, I will look at the attempts to deal with the abuses at Guantanamo by the American Commission on Human Rights, and by the US and Australian courts, as a way to understand why there needs to be a stronger support for habeas corpus than is today provided by regional courts.
机译:数百年来,诸如人身保护令等程序性权利被视为英美法学体系中的基础。在当代国际法中,基本规范被称为强制法。强制法规范是即使通过条约也不能克减的权利或规则。在经常列出的清单中,强制法规范包括反对侵略,种族隔离,奴隶制和种族灭绝的规范。此列表的所有成员均为实体权利。在本文中,我将争辩一些对刑事诉讼的公正运行至关重要的程序权利,例如人身保护令,也应具有强制法规范的地位。我将首先解释拥有强制法地位的权利的含义。在此之后,我将提出辩护,将人身保护令等程序权利添加到强制法规范列表中。然后,我将在欧洲人权委员会上演练关于程序性权利的强制性地位的一些辩论。在本文的最后,我将探讨美国人权委员会以及美国和澳大利亚法院为解决关塔那摩的虐待所进行的尝试,以此来理解为什么需要对人身保护令比区域法院今天提供的要多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号