首页> 外文期刊>Criminal Law and Philosophy >Criminals or Patients? Towards a Tragic Conception of Moral and Legal Responsibility
【24h】

Criminals or Patients? Towards a Tragic Conception of Moral and Legal Responsibility

机译:罪犯还是病人?走向道德和法律责任的悲剧构想

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There is a gap between, on the one hand, the tragic character of human action and, on the other hand, our moral and legal conceptions of responsibility that focus on individual agency and absolute guilt. Drawing on Kierkegaard’s understanding of tragic action and engaging with contemporary discourse on moral luck, poetic justice, and relational responsibility, this paper argues for a reform of our legal practices based on a less ‘harsh’ (Kierkegaard) conception of moral and legal responsibility and directed more at empathic understanding based on the emotional and imaginative appreciation of personal narratives. This may help our societies and communities to better cope with unacceptable deeds by individuals who are neither criminals nor patients, to make room for praise as well as blame and punishment, and to set up practices and institutions that do not rely on a conception of responsibility that is hard to bear for all of us.
机译:一方面,人类行为的悲剧性与另一方面,我们的道德和法律责任观念之间存在着差距,这些观念侧重于个人代理和绝对内。借鉴基尔凯郭尔对悲剧性行为的理解,并结合当代关于道德运气,诗意正义和关系责任的论述,本文主张基于较少的“苛刻”(基尔凯郭尔)道德和法律责任概念对我们的法律实践进行改革。在个人叙事的情感和想象力欣赏的基础上,更侧重于移情理解。这可以帮助我们的社会和社区更好地应对既不是犯罪分子也不是患者的个人无法接受的行为,为称赞,指责和惩罚创造空间,并建立不依赖责任概念的做法和机构这对我们所有人来说都是很难承受的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号