首页> 外文期刊>Creativity Research Journal >Solving and Creating Raven Progressive Matrices: Reasoning in Well- and Ill-Defined Problem Spaces
【24h】

Solving and Creating Raven Progressive Matrices: Reasoning in Well- and Ill-Defined Problem Spaces

机译:解决和创建Raven渐进矩阵:在定义良好和定义欠佳的问题空间中进行推理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We studied the development of creative cognition in children ranging from nursery school to Grade 6 (4-12 yr old, NÂ =Â 511), performing a problem generation task. The task involved inventing a novel item for a classical problem solving task they had completed beforehand: the Raven Progressive Matrices (RPM). This task and the generating task both comprise matrixes of components, to which a set of transformational relations are applied; only in the first case these are inferred to solve a puzzle, but in the second they are invented to create one. We analyzed the matrixes invented in the generation task and compared them to those of the original solving task. We observed that (a) both in solving and generation, the ability to combine more than 1 relation increased with grade level, (b) within all 8 grades, except Grades 3 and 6, performance was uncorrelated between both tasks, (c) relations that were applied in the generation task often did feature in the solving task, and (d) relations occurring in both tasks were applied with different frequencies. Overall, we conclude that standard problem solving ability is not a precondition for creative reasoning and that the comprehension of relations between components featured in solving task differs from that applied in generation.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.503541
机译:我们研究了从托儿所到6年级(4-12岁,N = 511)的儿童的创造性认知的发展,执行了问题产生任务。该任务涉及为他们先前完成的经典问题解决任务发明一种新颖的物品:Raven渐进矩阵(RPM)。该任务和生成任务都包括组件矩阵,在该矩阵上应用了一组转换关系;仅在第一种情况下,才可以推断出它们可以解决难题,而在第二种情况下,则可以发明出它们来创造一个谜题。我们分析了生成任务中发明的矩阵,并将其与原始求解任务中的矩阵进行了比较。我们观察到(a)在求解和生成方面,结合1个以上关系的能力随年级水平而提高;(b)在所有8个年级中,除3和6年级外,两个任务之间的绩效都不相关,(c)关系在生成任务中应用的关系常常在解决任务中发挥作用,并且(d)在两个任务中发生的关系都以不同的频率应用。总的来说,我们得出的结论是,标准的问题解决能力不是进行创造性推理的前提,并且解决任务中各个组件之间的关系理解与生成过程中所应用的理解有所不同。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.503541

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号