首页> 外文期刊>Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management >Can environmental, social, and governance rating agencies favor business models that promote a more sustainable development?
【24h】

Can environmental, social, and governance rating agencies favor business models that promote a more sustainable development?

机译:环境,社会和治理评级机构可以支持促进更可持续发展的商业模式吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The development of sustainable finance favors the appearance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) rating agencies as providers of ESG information and tools for measuring the contribution of companies to sustainable development. This paper attempts to show whether assessment methods adopted by eight ESG agencies are consistent with the Integrative ESG Sustainable Value Framework proposed according to the literature and sustainable business models (SBMs) conceptualization. An exploratory research analyzes whether these methods are identifying and/or driving more SBMs that contribute to promote the creation of sustainable value, seeking to generate economic, social, and environmental value. Results indicate that ESG rating agencies identify the short-term results in the internal organizational perspective mainly in the environmental dimension, whereas social aspects are emphasized from the external organizational perspective. However, ESG rating agencies are not driving a more SBMs that must integrate ESG criteria in a holistic way with a short-term and long-term perspective.
机译:可持续金融的发展有利于环境,社会和治理(ESG)评级机构的出现,它们是ESG信息和工具的提供者,用于衡量公司对可持续发展的贡献。本文试图证明八个ESG机构采用的评估方法是否与根据文献和可持续商业模型(SBMs)概念化提出的ESG可持续价值综合框架相一致。一项探索性研究分析了这些方法是否正在识别和/或驱动更多的SBM,这些SBM有助于促进可持续价值的创造,寻求产生经济,社会和环境价值。结果表明,ESG评级机构主要在环境方面从内部组织角度确定短期结果,而从外部组织角度强调社会方面。但是,ESG评级机构并没有推动更多的SBM,这些SBM必须以短期和长期的角度从整体上整合ESG标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号