...
首页> 外文期刊>Corporate Governance >Developing Corporate Governance Research through Qualitative Methods: A Review of Previous Studies
【24h】

Developing Corporate Governance Research through Qualitative Methods: A Review of Previous Studies

机译:通过定性方法发展公司治理研究:以往研究的回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Manuscript Type: Review Research Question/Issue: The article is concerned with the prevalence, character, and development of qualitative research within the field of corporate governance. The paper provides an overview of published qualitative research in the field of corporate governance based on a structured literature search of papers published in scholarly peer-reviewed journals between 1986 and 2011. Research Findings/Insights: A fine-grained search based on key words resulted in a sample of 78 qualitative corporate governance studies. A review and content analysis of these studies show that qualitative studies in governance have grown in number since the 1990s, but remain a small fraction of the published work on corporate governance. Studies are mostly developed by UK and European scholars, published in European journals and tend to explore boards of directors more than other governance related actors and mechanisms. These studies utilize a range of disciplines, predominantly management, adopting a wide range of methods, the most prevalent being that of the interview, often in combination with other methods to get a better account of the empirical phenomenon. Theoretical/Academic Implications: The search reveals an eclectic range of theories, spanning several disciplines, which is serving to generate, elaborate, and refine theorizing about corporate governance and the associated meanings, mechanisms, processes and relationships. There is much scope and need for more qualitative studies of significant rigor and relevance which explore the array of interactions and processes involved in corporate governance, across different levels of analysis and contexts. Practitioner/Policy Implications: After over two decades of research and reform of corporate governance, problems of practice remain, and corporate governance prescription via codes and other forms of regulation is increasing in search of better governance. Qualitative research can assist policy-makers and practitioners to develop more efficient governance mechanisms, by shedding light on the efficacy of policy prescription. Qualitative research provides a basis for rethinking and challenging some of the dominant assumptions and meanings about how governance actors and institutions actually function.
机译:论文类型:评论研究问题/问题:本文关注公司治理领域中定性研究的普遍性,特征和发展。本文基于对1986年至2011年间在学术同行评审期刊上发表的论文的结构化文献搜索,对公司治理领域中已发表的定性研究进行了概述。研究发现/见解:基于关键词的精细搜索在78项定性公司治理研究的样本中。对这些研究的回顾和内容分析表明,自1990年代以来,治理方面的定性研究数量有所增加,但仅占已发表的公司治理工作的一小部分。研究主要由英国和欧洲学者开发,并在欧洲期刊上发表,并且比其他与治理相关的参与者和机制更倾向于探索董事会。这些研究利用一系列学科,主要是管理学,采用多种方法,最普遍的是访谈方法,通常与其他方法结合使用,以更好地说明经验现象。理论/学术含义:该搜索揭示了涵盖多个学科的折衷的理论范围,这些理论用于产生,阐述和完善关于公司治理以及相关含义,机制,过程和关系的理论。有大量的范围和需要进行更严格和更相关的定性研究,以研究公司治理所涉及的各种相互作用和过程,涉及不同层次的分析和环境。从业者/政策含义:经过二十多年的公司治理研究和改革,实践问题仍然存在,通过守则和其他形式的法规制定公司治理规定的过程也在不断增加,以寻求更好的治理。定性研究可以通过阐明政策规定的有效性,来帮助决策者和从业者建立更有效的治理机制。定性研究为重新思考和挑战有关治理行为体和机构实际运作方式的一些主要假设和含义提供了基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号