...
首页> 外文期刊>Control of Network Systems, IEEE Transactions on >Truthful Data Quality Elicitation for Quality-Aware Data Crowdsourcing
【24h】

Truthful Data Quality Elicitation for Quality-Aware Data Crowdsourcing

机译:质量感知数据众包的真实数据质量诱因

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Data crowdsourcing has found a broad range of applications (e.g., environmental monitoring and image classification) by leveraging the "wisdom" of a potentially large crowd of "workers" (e.g., mobile users). A key metric of crowdsourcing is data accuracy, which relies on the quality of the participating workers' data (e.g., the probability that the data are equal to the ground truth). However, the data quality of a worker can be its own private information (which the worker learns, e.g., based on its location) that it may have incentive to misreport, which can, in turn, mislead the crowdsourcing requester about the accuracy of the data. This issue is further complicated by the fact that the worker can also manipulate its effort made in the crowdsourcing task and the data reported to the requester, which can also mislead the requester. In this paper, we devise truthful crowdsourcing mechanisms for quality, effort, and data elicitation (QEDE), which incentivize strategic workers to truthfully report their private worker quality and data to the requester, and make truthful effort as desired by the requester. The truthful design of the QEDE mechanisms overcomes the lack of ground truth and the coupling in the joint elicitation of the worker quality, effort, and data. Under the QEDE mechanisms, we characterize the socially optimal and the requester's optimal (RO) task assignments, and analyze their performance. We show that the RO assignment is determined by the largest "virtual quality" rather than the highest quality among workers, which depends on the worker's quality and the quality's distribution. We evaluate the QEDE mechanisms using simulations that demonstrate the truthfulness of the mechanisms and the performance of the optimal task assignments.
机译:数据众包通过利用潜在大群“工人”(例如移动用户)的“智慧”,找到了广泛的应用(例如,环境监测和图像分类)。众包的一个关键指标是数据准确性,它依赖于参与工人数据的质量(例如,数据等于地面真理的概率)。然而,工作人员的数据质量可以是自己的私人信息(工人在其位置学习,例如,基于其位置)它可能对误报引起误报,这可以依次误导众包请求者了解的准确性数据。这一问题进一步复杂于,工人还可以操纵其在众包任务中所做的努力和向请求者报告的数据,这也可以误导请求者。在本文中,我们为质量,努力和数据倡导(QEDE)设计了真实的众包机制,这激励了战略工人,如实地向请求者报告其私人工作者质量和数据,并根据要求做出真实的努力。 Q德机制的真实设计克服了工人质量,努力和数据的联合引发中缺乏地面真理和耦合。在QEDE机制下,我们将社会最佳和请求者的最佳(RO)任务分配描述,并分析其性能。我们表明RO分配是由最大的“虚拟质量”决定,而不是工人之间的最高质量,这取决于工人的质量和质量的分布。我们使用模拟来评估Q辩护机制,这些模拟证明了机制的真实性以及最佳任务分配的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号