首页> 外文期刊>Construction Management and Economics >The informal construction sector and the inefficiency of low cost housing markets
【24h】

The informal construction sector and the inefficiency of low cost housing markets

机译:非正规建筑部门和低成本住房市场的低效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Urban low cost housing markets in developing countries are often inefficient and subsidized programmes can add further market distortions. In the case of South Africa, one of the important causes of the inefficiency of the housing market (and one that is often ignored) is the fact that housing policies and construction practices systematically exclude the informal construction sector: the very sector that has been the only source of delivery of affordable housing for the bottom poor. After the end of the apartheid era and the transition to democracy in 1994, an ambitious programme of subsidized housing was implemented in the country. Since then, more than 1.6 million housing units have been built but the housing policies have not created a functional residential market for low income South Africans. In spite of the good intentions of the stakeholders in the marketplace, some projects developed by NGOs do not help to overcome these shortcomings and frequently accentuate some of the inefficiencies of the market. Four case studies of housing projects in Cape Town show the common constraints derived from institutional structures and prevailing attitudes among the NGOs and other stakeholders that prevent the informal sector from being involved. Giving greater participation to the informal sector in subsidized housing projects might prove difficult as it requires modification of structural policies and reformulation of the principles and values of urban intervention. However, these changes are required to reduce the housing deficit in South Africa.
机译:发展中国家的城市低成本住房市场通常效率低下,有补贴的计划可能会进一步加剧市场扭曲。就南非而言,住房市场效率低下的重要原因之一(经常被忽略)是住房政策和建筑实践系统地将非正式建筑部门排除在外的事实:底层穷人唯一可负担的住房交付来源。在种族隔离时代结束和1994年向民主过渡之后,该国实施了一项雄心勃勃的补贴住房计划。自那时以来,已经建造了超过160万套住房,但是住房政策并未为低收入的南非人创造一个功能完善的住宅市场。尽管利益相关者在市场上有良好的意愿,但非政府组织开发的一些项目无助于克服这些缺点,并经常加剧市场的低效率。开普敦住房项目的四个案例研究显示,非政府组织和其他利益相关者之间的体制结构和普遍态度导致了共同的制约因素,这些因素阻碍了非正规部门的参与。让非正规部门更多地参与补贴住房项目可能很困难,因为这需要修改结构性政策,并重新制定城市干预的原则和价值观。但是,需要进行这些更改以减少南非的住房短缺。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号