...
首页> 外文期刊>Construction and Building Materials >Comparison of environmental benchmarks of masonry and concrete structure based on a building model
【24h】

Comparison of environmental benchmarks of masonry and concrete structure based on a building model

机译:基于建筑模型的砖混结构环境基准比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Construction materials have distinguished energy consumptions and different emissions of carbon dioxide from fabrication up to application. The processes and the treatments needed to transform the raw materials into the final products, the transport to the construction sites and the techniques used for their application, all contribute to the differences in embodied energy and carbon footprint of these materials. In an environmental assessment one wonders what kind of constructive solution is environmentally more favorable. This study refers to the environmental comparison of reinforced concrete and clay bricks. Through a digital three-dimensional building model the required data are analyzed. The building is once considered with a reinforced concrete structure, consisting of columns, beams and slabs, with brick walls in between the columns in the periphery and interior of the building. Then, structural masonry with clay blocks in the exterior and interior walls is studied. Both models are analyzed in two versions. In the first version the slabs are of reinforced concrete and in the second version the slabs are built in pre stressed concrete beams and clay blocks. The building model represents for all solutions equal conditions. The comparison is limited to the quantification of the most important environmental parameters, the embodied energy and CO2 emissions. The results of this study show that the Masonry Model Version 1 has a 11% reduction in CO2 and 12% reduction in energy consumption, while Version 2 of both models has a 39% reduction in CO2 emissions and 41% reduction in embodied energy in case of Masonry Model and 30% reduction in CO2 emissions and 32% embodied energy in case of the Concrete Model compared to the Concrete Model with reinforced concrete slabs. These differences are due to the reduction of reinforced concrete, which is more significant in Versions 2. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:从制造到应用,建筑材料具有显着的能耗和二氧化碳排放量。将原材料转变为最终产品所需的过程和处理,运往建筑工地的运输以及用于其应用的技术,所有这些都导致了这些材料的内在能量和碳足迹的差异。在环境评估中,有人想知道哪种建设性解决方案在环境上更有利。这项研究涉及钢筋混凝土和粘土砖的环境比较。通过数字三维建筑模型,可以分析所需的数据。该建筑物曾经被认为是一种钢筋混凝土结构,由圆柱,横梁和平板组成,在建筑物外围和内部的圆柱之间具有砖墙。然后,研究了在外墙和内墙中均带有粘土砖的结构砌体。两种模型都有两个版本进行分析。在第一个版本中,平板是钢筋混凝土,在第二个版本中,平板是用预应力混凝土梁和黏土块建造的。对于所有解决方案,建筑模型均代表相同的条件。比较仅限于量化最重要的环境参数,具体体现的能量和二氧化碳排放量。这项研究的结果表明,砌体模型第1版的二氧化碳排放量减少了11%,能耗降低了12%,而两种模型的版本2的二氧化碳排放量减少了39%,实际能耗降低了41%与采用钢筋混凝土板的混凝土模型相比,混凝土模型可减少30%的二氧化碳排放量和32%的内含能量。这些差异是由于减少了钢筋混凝土,这在版本2中更为重要。(C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号