...
首页> 外文期刊>Construction and Building Materials >Effectiveness of fly ash and cement for compressed stabilized earth block construction
【24h】

Effectiveness of fly ash and cement for compressed stabilized earth block construction

机译:粉煤灰和水泥对压缩稳定地球砌块构建的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For saving natural resources, reducing pollution and increasing energy efficiency, Compressed Stabilized Earth Block (CSEB) can serve as a suitable alternative to conventional Fired Clay Brick (FCB). In this study, suitability of industrial waste, Fly Ash (FA) is assessed along with cement as stabilizers for producing CSEBs with coarse grained soil. Different combination of cement and FA (5-10% cement and 5-25% FA; by weight of dry soil) was considered to prepare CSEBs for finding the optimum mix composition in terms of strength, durability, deformation characteristics and cost effectiveness. Furthermore, strength and durability test results are compared to the design criteria reported in Indian Standard, Sri Lankan Standard, Standard Australia, British Standard and Malaysian Standard for assessing its viability as construction material. With the increase in cement content, strength of the blocks gradually increases; however, at a definite cement content, addition of FA increases strength up to a certain limit and then begins to drop. Inclusion of 7-8% cement and 15-20% FA is found to provide adequate dry compressive strength (5 MPa), wet-to-dry compressive strength (0.33) and enough durability in terms of water absorption (20%) as recommended by British Standard and Standards Australia. The behavior of the CSEBs were also analyzed through microstructural investigation, where SEM images were taken to ascertain the morphologic and anatomic changes that occurred at different fly ash contents. At a definite cement content, with the increase of FA, peak strain and failure strain increase; thereby indicating an improved straining capacity of the blocks due to inclusion of FA. Moreover, modulus of elasticity improves with increasing amount of cement and FA for both dry and wet state. Furthermore, economic analysis of a typical house constructed with CSEBs and FCBs was performed and compared with literature. Considering all the parameters it can be concluded that CSEBs prepared with cement and fly ash as stabilizers can be used as a sustainable construction material. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:为了节省自然资源,减少污染和增加能效,压缩稳定的地球块(CSEB)可以作为传统烧制粘土砖(FCB)的合适替代品。在这项研究中,工业废物的适用性,粉煤灰(FA)与水泥作为稳定剂进行评估,用于用粗粒土壤生产CSCEBS。考虑了水泥和FA(5-10%水泥和5-25%的5-25%的5-25%)的不同组合,用于制备CSEBS,用于在强度,耐久性,变形特征和成本效益方面寻找最佳混合组合物。此外,将强度和耐用性测试结果与印度标准,斯里兰卡标准,标准澳大利亚,英国标准和马来西亚标准的设计标准进行了比较,用于评估其作为建筑材料的可行性。随着水泥含量的增加,块的强度逐渐增加;然而,在一个明确的水泥含量下,加入Fa增加到一定限度,然后开始下降。包含7-8%水泥和15-20%的Fa,提供足够的干式压缩强度(> 5MPa),湿对抗压强度(> 0.33),在吸水率方面足够耐久性(<20%) )按照英国标准和标准澳大利亚的推荐。通过微观结构调查分析了CSEBS的行为,其中采集了SEM图像以确定不同粉煤灰含量发生的形态学和解剖学变化。在一定的水泥含量,随着FA,峰值应变和失效应变的增加增加;由此表示由于包含FA的块的改进的应变能力。此外,随着干燥和湿润状态的增加,弹性模量随着水泥和FA的增加而改善。此外,对与CSCEBS和FCB构建的典型房屋的经济分析进行了并与文学进行了比较。考虑到所有参数,可以得出结论,用水泥和粉煤灰制备的CSEB作为稳定剂可用作可持续的建筑材料。 (c)2020 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号