...
首页> 外文期刊>Construction and Building Materials >Comparison of artificial neural network (ANN) and response surface methodology (RSM) prediction in compressive strength of recycled concrete aggregates
【24h】

Comparison of artificial neural network (ANN) and response surface methodology (RSM) prediction in compressive strength of recycled concrete aggregates

机译:再生混凝土聚集体抗压强度的人工神经网络(ANN)和响应面方法(RSM)预测的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study aims at predicting and modeling the 7; 28 and 56 days compressive strength of a concrete containing concrete's recycled coarse aggregates and that, for different range of cement content and slump. To achieve this, the response surface methodology (RSM) and the artificial neural networks (ANN) approaches were used for three variable processes modeling (cement content in the range of 300 to 400 kg/m(3), percentage of recycled coarse aggregate from 0 to 100% and slump from 5 to 12 +/- 1 cm). The results indicate that the compressive strength of recycled concrete at 7, 28 and 56 days is strongly influenced by the cement content, %RCA and slump (p 0.01). It is found that the compressive strength at 7, 28 and 56 days decreases from 22.62 to 18.56, 34.91 to 28.70 and 37.77 to 32.26 respectively with increasing in RCA from 0 to 100% at middle levels of cement content and slump. The results in statistical terms; relative percent deviation (RDP), mean squared error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), determination coefficient (R-2) and adjusted coefficient (R-adj(2)), reveals that the both approaches ANN and RSM are a powerful tools for the prediction of the compressive strength. Furthermore, ANN and RSM models are very well correlated with experimental data. However, artificial neural network model shows better accuracy. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本研究旨在预测和建模7; 28和56天抑制混凝土循环粗聚集体的混凝土的抗压强度,即用于不同范围的水泥含量和坍落度。为了实现这一点,响应表面方法(RSM)和人工神经网络(ANN)方法用于三种可变过程建模(水泥含量在300至400kg / m(3)的范围内,来自的再循环粗骨料的百分比0至100%,5至12 +/- 1厘米坍塌)。结果表明,7,28和56天的再生混凝土的抗压强度受水泥含量,%RCA和坍落度的影响强烈影响(P <0.01)。发现7,28和56天的抗压强度分别从22.62至18.56,34.91至28.70和37.77-77至32.26分别在中间水平的水泥含量和坍落度下的0%至100%的增加。统计术语的结果;相对百分比偏差(RDP),均方误差(MSE),根均方误差(RMSE),确定系数(R-2)和调整的系数(R-ACJ(2)),揭示了两种方法ANN和RSM一种用于预测抗压强度的强大工具。此外,ANN和RSM模型与实验数据非常好。然而,人工神经网络模型显示出更好的准确性。 (c)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号