...
首页> 外文期刊>Construction and Building Materials >Flexural performance of steel-reinforced engineered cementitious composites with different reinforcing ratios and steel types
【24h】

Flexural performance of steel-reinforced engineered cementitious composites with different reinforcing ratios and steel types

机译:不同补强比和钢种的钢增强工程胶结复合材料的抗弯性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Reinforced engineered cementitious composites (ECC) flexural members fail either after a dominant crack forms (i.e., crack localization) or after gradual strain hardening of reinforcing steel. These two failure paths represent distinct ductility ranges and load reduction mechanisms that have not been fully characterized. This study experimentally investigates the two failure paths of flexural members with different reinforcing ratios (0.53%-2.10%), two types of reinforcing steel (A615 Grade 60 and A1035 Grade 100), and under monotonic and cyclic loading conditions. A total of twelve simply-supported beams are tested including two conventional concrete beams for baseline comparisons. Based on the experimental results, a recently-developed flexural strength prediction method is validated. Results show that (1) the two failure paths are affected by the reinforcing ratio and steel type, (2) ECC sustains a maximum compressive strain that is larger than 1.0% before crushing, (3) ECC effectively restrains crack width opening for flexural members using high strength (Grade 100) steel reinforcement, and (4) a recently proposed flexural strength prediction method is able to predict the experimentally observed flexural strength of the beams with an error less than 5%. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:钢筋工程胶结复合材料(ECC)的抗弯构件在主要的裂缝形式(即裂缝局部化)之后或在钢筋逐渐应变硬化后会失效。这两个故障路径代表了尚未完全表征的不同的延展性范围和减载机制。本研究通过实验研究了不同配筋率(0.53%-2.10%),两种类型的钢筋(A615 60级和A1035 100级)以及在单调和循环载荷条件下弯曲构件的两种破坏路径。总共测试了十二根简支梁,其中包括两个用于基准线比较的常规混凝土梁。基于实验结果,验证了最近开发的弯曲强度预测方法。结果表明:(1)两种破坏路径均受钢筋配比和钢筋类型的影响;(2)ECC在破碎前承受的最大压缩应变大于1.0%;(3)ECC有效地抑制了挠性构件的裂缝宽度使用高强度(100级)钢筋进行加固,以及(4)最近提出的抗弯强度预测方法能够预测实验观察到的梁的抗弯强度,其误差小于5%。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号