...
首页> 外文期刊>Construction and Building Materials >Comparative study of geopolymer and alkali activated slag concrete comprising waste foundry sand
【24h】

Comparative study of geopolymer and alkali activated slag concrete comprising waste foundry sand

机译:含废铸造砂的地聚合物与碱活化矿渣混凝土的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Concrete industry and current construction practices are highly unsustainable from the standpoint of energy consumption and their high dependence on natural resources. Using alternative binders to conventional cement such as geopolymers and alkali activated slags (MS) can be one alternative. Besides, reusing industrial by-product and waste materials in construction industry can also be emphasized. These measures can substantially lower the carbon emissions and embodied energy of concrete along with solving the problem of industrial waste disposal. The current study reports the influence of inclusion of waste foundry sand (WFS), a by-product from foundry industries, on strength, permeability and microstructure of low calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete (GPC) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) based alkali activated slag (AAS) concrete, both cured in ambient conditions. The mix proportions for both the concretes were kept same. The natural sand was replaced by WFS in the range of 0% to 100% at an interval of 20%. Tests on hardened concretes, to study, compressive strength, split tensile strength, capillary suction, SEM and EDS analysis, were conducted to assess the strength, permeability and microstructure of both types of concretes. Addition of WFS lowered the workability of GPC and MS concretes and the effect was abrupt beyond 40% WFS replacement level. Strength and sorptivity of both concretes improved upto 60% WFS replacement in GPC, whereas, upto 20% replacement in MS concrete mixes, besides more than 45% of strength of reference concretes (0% WFS) was achievable at 100% replacement by WFS. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:从能耗和对自然资源的高度依赖的角度来看,混凝土工业和当前的建筑实践是高度不可持续的。使用传统水泥的替代粘合剂,例如地质聚合物和碱活化矿渣(MS),可能是一种替代方法。此外,还可以强调在建筑业中再利用工业副产品和废料。这些措施可以大大降低混凝土的碳排放量和内含能量,并解决工业废物处理的问题。当前的研究报道了铸造行业的副产品废物铸造砂(WFS)的掺入对低钙粉煤灰地质聚合物混凝土(GPC)和高炉矿渣粉(GGBS)的强度,渗透性和微观结构的影响碱活化矿渣(AAS)混凝土,均在环境条件下固化。两种混凝土的混合比例保持相同。天然砂被WFS替代,范围为0%至100%,间隔为20%。对硬化混凝土进行了测试,以研究其抗压强度,劈裂抗拉强度,毛细吸力,SEM和EDS分析,以评估两种类型混凝土的强度,渗透性和微观结构。加入WFS降低了GPC和MS混凝土的可加工性,超过40%的WFS替代水平后,效果突然出现。在GPC中,两种混凝土的强度和吸附性均提高了WFS的替代率,最高可替代60%,而在MS混凝土混合料中,替代率最高可达到20%,而在WFS替代率达到100%的情况下,可达到参考混凝土强度的45%以上(0%WFS)。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号