首页> 外文期刊>Construction and Building Materials >Comparison of the use of angle brackets in timber joints with eurocode 5
【24h】

Comparison of the use of angle brackets in timber joints with eurocode 5

机译:欧规5在木材接头中使用尖括号的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The aim of this study is to describe the design of steel angle bracket in timber joints. The design has insufficient support in the existing standards. The load-bearing capacity of these connections can be calculated in accordance with EN 1995-1-1 Eurocode 5, Chapter 8 Connections with metallic fasteners. The main drawback is that this manual only focuses on the metallic fasteners itself. The other disadvantage is that it does not look into the question of stiffness of the joint, its deformation, which is often a problem with these connections. This issue was confirmed by experiments in this study. Eight different angle brackets have been tested in the load direction where the part of the metallic fasteners is stressed in the pull and the second part in the shear. In addition, three different angle brackets were tested in the load direction where all the metallic fasteners are stressed in shear. These experiments were compared with computational models and the calculations according to EC 5. The computational models were performed in software RFEM5. The angle brackets were modeled, nails and wood were replaced by point or flat supports. The results from computational models are comparable to experiments. However, the values given by the calculations according to EC 5 are considerably higher than the real load-bearing capacities obtained from the experiments. Therefore the use of EC 5 for this type of connections can be dangerous in practice. The differences between experiments, models and calculations indicate the difficulty of designing timber joints with three-dimensional nailing plates. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究的目的是描述木材接头中的钢制角钢支架的设计。该设计对现有标准的支持不足。这些连接的承载能力可以根据EN 1995-1-1欧洲规范5,第8章使用金属紧固件的连接来计算。主要缺点是,本手册仅针对金属紧固件本身。另一个缺点是,它没有考虑接头的刚度及其变形的问题,而这通常是这些连接的问题。该问题已通过本研究中的实验得到证实。在载荷方向上测试了八个不同的角撑架,其中金属紧固件的一部分在拉力中受力,第二部分在剪力中受力。此外,在载荷方向上测试了三个不同的角撑,其中所有金属紧固件都承受剪切力。将这些实验与计算模型进行比较,并根据EC 5进行计算。计算模型在软件RFEM5中执行。对尖括号进行了建模,将钉子和木头替换为点支撑或平面支撑。计算模型的结果与实验相当。但是,根据EC 5的计算得出的值明显高于从实验中获得的实际承载能力。因此,在实践中将EC 5用于此类连接可能很危险。实验,模型和计算之间的差异表明了用三维钉板设计木材接缝的难度。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号