...
【24h】

Who pays the piper...

机译:谁付钱给吹笛者...

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In a move mirroring that of Hutchison Port Holdings (HPH) in Felixstowe and Thamesport in the UK, P&O Ports (P&OP) implemented a security charge of GBP5.5 (USD9.9) per laden import/export container for shippers in Southampton on July 1, 2004. This compares with HPH's charges of GBP5.5 (USD9.9) per container for exports and GBP10.5 (USD19.1) per container for imports introduced in February 2004. The impetus for these charges stems from the extra container terminal security required by the International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code. Like HPH, P&OP sees no reason why it should absorb these costs entirely, and has decided to invoice shippers directly. P&OP is one of the world's larger port operators, so its decision to mimic HPH's actions in the UK will have wider implications for shippers. Many ports around the world are known to be watching the UK situation carefully before announcing their own charges - and, more importantly, before deciding on who should pay them. That said, HPH is also attempting to recover its security charges in Rotterdam through ocean carriers instead of shippers, and continues to face much resistance from shippers in the UK.
机译:为了反映英国费利克斯托和英国泰晤士港的和记港口控股(HPH),P&O港口(P&OP)于7月对南安普敦的每个托运人实施了每个装货集装箱5.5英镑(9.9美元)的安全保证金2004年1月1日。HPH于2004年2月开始对每个集装箱的出口收取5.5英镑(9.9美元),对进口的每个容器收取10.5英镑(19.1美元)的费用。这些费用的动力来自额外的集装箱国际船舶和港口设施安全(ISPS)规则要求的终端安全性。与HPH一样,P&OP认为没有理由完全承担这些费用,因此决定直接向发货人开具发票。 P&OP是世界上最大的港口运营商之一,因此,其模仿HPH在英国行动的决定将对托运人产生更广泛的影响。众所周知,世界各地的许多港口在宣布自己的费用之前,更重要的是,在决定由谁付款之前,会仔细观察英国的情况。也就是说,HPH还试图通过海运承运人而不是托运人追回在鹿特丹的保安费用,并且继续面临英国托运人的巨大阻力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号