...
首页> 外文期刊>Computers & operations research >A best-of-breed iterated greedy for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem with makespan objective
【24h】

A best-of-breed iterated greedy for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem with makespan objective

机译:具有makepan目标的置换flowshop调度问题的最佳迭代贪婪

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this paper, we analyse several issues concerning the most efficient approximate algorithms for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem with makespan objective. On the one hand, it is not clear which algorithm obtains the best solutions for the problem, since (1) conflicting results have been reported regarding the implementation of a key part in one of these algorithms (the FF tie-breaking mechanism by Fernandez-Viagas and Framinan, 2014), and (2) some recent contributions have appeared independently, so they have not been compared so-far. On the other hand, since all these efficient methods consist of specialised variants of an iterated greedy algorithm, it is worth exploring if their specific features can be efficiently combined so a new, best-of-breed algorithm can be designed. These questions are addressed in this paper by first conducting an extensive comparison among the best-so-far algorithms (including a detailed description of the FF tie-breaking algorithm and the posting of its source codes to ensure full reproducibility), and then by designing a best-of-breed combination of these algorithms. The computational experience carried out shows that the new algorithm designed significantly outperform existing ones, thus being the best-so-far approximate method for the problem. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在本文中,我们分析了关于具有makepan目标的置换flowshop调度问题的最有效的近似算法的几个问题。一方面,目前尚不清楚哪种算法能为该问题找到最佳解决方案,因为(1)据报道,其中一种算法的关键部分的实现存在冲突的结果(Fernandez-FF的FF抢七机制Viagas和Framinan,2014年),以及(2)一些最近的贡献独立出现,因此到目前为止尚未进行比较。另一方面,由于所有这些有效方法均由迭代贪婪算法的特殊变体组成,因此值得探索是否可以有效组合其特定特征,从而可以设计出一种新的同类最佳算法。通过首先在最佳算法之间进行广泛的比较(包括对FF平局决胜算法的详细描述以及其源代码的发布以确保完全可重复性),然后通过设计,可以解决这些问题。这些算法的最佳组合。进行的计算经验表明,新算法的设计明显优于现有算法,因此是迄今为止该问题的最佳近似方法。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号