首页> 外文期刊>Computers & Industrial Engineering >Supply chain risk management considering put options and service level constraints
【24h】

Supply chain risk management considering put options and service level constraints

机译:考虑认沽期权和服务水平约束的供应链风险管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper considers a supply chain composed of a supplier and a retailer who commits to a service level to make end-users happy and promote sales. To reduce the losses resulting from the high demand volatility, the retailer purchases put options from the supplier to adjust its initial order. The optimal ordering and production policies with and without put options under the service level constraint are derived. We find that, in the two cases, the expected profits of the retailer are non-increasing in the service level constraint while that of the supplier are non-decreasing in it. Model comparison reveals that with put options, the retailer will offer higher service level and earn more profit than without; such effect is more salient when the demand is more variable. However, the put option contract will not always benefit the supplier especially when the service constraint is high. We also find that put option contract can effectively improve the decentralized system's performance, but this only happens when the service constraint is low. In addition, we find that put option contract have no better capability than wholesales price contract in coordinating the supply chain in the presence of a service level constraint.
机译:本文考虑由供应商和零售商组成的供应链,他们致力于提供服务水平以使最终用户满意并促进销售。为了减少高需求波动带来的损失,零售商从供应商处购买认沽期权以调整其初始订单。推导了在服务水平约束下带或不带看跌期权的最优订货和生产策略。我们发现,在这两种情况下,零售商的预期利润在服务水平约束中没有增加,而供应商的预期利润却没有减少。模型比较表明,与认沽期权相比,零售商将提供更高的服务水平并获得更多的利润。当需求变化更大时,这种效果更加明显。但是,认沽期权合同并不总是能使供应商受益,尤其是在服务约束较高的情况下。我们还发现,认沽期权合约可以有效地提高分散系统的性能,但这仅在服务约束较低时才会发生。此外,我们发现在存在服务水平约束的情况下,认沽期权合同在协调供应链方面没有比批发价格合同更好的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号