首页> 外文期刊>Computers in Human Behavior >Interrupt me: External interruptions are less disruptive than self-interruptions
【24h】

Interrupt me: External interruptions are less disruptive than self-interruptions

机译:打扰我:外部打扰的干扰性小于自打扰性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Interruptions are part of everyday life and are known to be disruptive. With, the current study we investigated which kind of interruption is more disruptive: external interruptions or self-interruptions. We conducted two experiments, one behavioral experiment (28 participants) and one in which pupil dilation was measured (21 participants). In both experiments, self-interruptions made participants complete the main task slower than external interruptions (occurring at similar moments in the task as the self-interruptions). However, there was no difference between the two kinds of interruptions in the time needed to resume the main task (resumption lag). Instead, the pupil dilation data revealed that the decision to self-interrupt takes about 1 s, resulting in slower performance overall. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:中断是日常生活的一部分,并且已知会造成破坏。通过当前的研究,我们研究了哪种中断更具破坏性:外部中断或自中断。我们进行了两项实验,一项是行为实验(28名参与者),另一项是测量瞳孔扩张的参与者(21名参与者)。在这两个实验中,自我干扰使参与者完成主要任务的速度比外部干扰要慢(发生在任务中与自我干扰相似的时刻)。但是,两种中断在恢复主要任务所需的时间(恢复滞后)方面没有区别。取而代之的是,瞳孔扩大数据表明自我中断的决定大约需要1 s,从而导致整体性能降低。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号