首页> 外文期刊>Computer networks >Comparative study of two congestion pricing schemes: auction and tatonnement
【24h】

Comparative study of two congestion pricing schemes: auction and tatonnement

机译:两种交通拥堵定价方案的比较研究:拍卖和重排

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We evaluate two mechanisms for setting prices in a QoS-enhanced network with congestion-sensitive pricing and resource allocation based on users' willingness to pay. In the first model, the congestion-sensitive component of the price is calculated by tatonnement, with the price adjusted gradually to drive down the user demand to the supply level of network resources. In the second model, each user submits multiple bids for different bandwidths, each bid expressing its willingness to pay a certain premium for the corresponding bandwidth during congestion. Simulations show that both approaches provide greater network availability, revenue, and perceived user-benefit than a congestion-independent policy. Both approaches have generally similar performance in terms of perceived user-benefit. The tatonnement-based model obtains higher network revenue than the auction-based model. The auction-based model achieves higher network utilization at a given level of perceived user-benefit, but has higher implementation complexity and longer set-up delay for new connections. The proposed auction-based model serves more users than comparable auction-based schemes, and has less signaling overhead and greater certainty of service availability.
机译:我们评估了两种在拥塞敏感的定价和资源分配(基于用户的支付意愿)下在QoS增强的网络中设置价格的机制。在第一个模型中,价格的拥塞敏感部分是通过重吨数计算的,价格逐渐调整以将用户需求降低到网络资源的供应水平。在第二种模型中,每个用户针对不同的带宽提交多个投标,每个投标都表示其愿意在拥塞期间为相应的带宽支付一定的溢价。仿真表明,与独立于拥塞的策略相比,这两种方法都可提供更大的网络可用性,收入和可感知的用户利益。就感知到的用户利益而言,两种方法通常具有相似的性能。与基于拍卖的模型相比,基于重排的模型获得更高的网络收入。基于拍卖的模型可以在给定的用户利益水平下实现更高的网络利用率,但是具有更高的实现复杂性和更长的新连接建立延迟。与可比的基于拍卖的方案相比,所提出的基于拍卖的模型为更多的用户提供服务,并且具有更少的信令开销和更大的服务可用性确定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号