...
首页> 外文期刊>Computer law & security report >Law versus technology: Blockchain, GDPR, and tough tradeoffs
【24h】

Law versus technology: Blockchain, GDPR, and tough tradeoffs

机译:法律与技术:区块链,GDPR和艰难的权衡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Inconsistency between the way in which the law is structured, and the way in which technologies actually operate is always an interesting and useful topic to explore. When a law conflicts with a business model, the solution will often be changing the business model. However, when the law comes into conflict with the architecture of hardware and software, it is less clear how the problem will be managed.In this paper, we analyze the contradiction of blockchain technology and the requirements of GDPR. The three contradictions we examine are (i) right to be forgotten versus irreversibility/immutability of records, (ii) data protection by design versus tamper-proofness and transparency of blockchain, and (iii) data controller versus decentralized nodes. We highlight that the conflicts can be handled through focusing on commonalities of GDPR and the blockchain, developing new approaches and interpretations, and tailoring the blockchain technology according to the needs of data protection law. (C) 2020 Unal Tatar, Yasir Gokce, Brian Nussbaum. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:法律结构的方式之间的不一致性以及技术实际运作的方式始终是探索的有趣和有用的话题。当法律与商业模式冲突时,解决方案通常会改变商业模式。但是,当法律与硬件和软件的架构发生冲突时,这不清楚如何管理问题。本文分析了区块链技术的矛盾和GDPR的要求。我们审查的三个矛盾是(i)被遗忘的权利与记录的不可逆转/不可逆转性,(ii)通过设计与篡改篡改和透明度的数据保护,(iii)数据控制器与分散节点。我们强调,通过专注于GDPR和区块链的共性,开发新方法和解释,以及根据数据保护法的需求来定制区块链技术的冲突。 (c)2020 Unal Tatar,Yasir Gokce,Brian Nussbaum。 elsevier有限公司出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号