首页> 外文期刊>Computer law & security report >The data protection framework decision of 27 November 2008 regarding police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - A modest achievement however not the improvement some have hoped for
【24h】

The data protection framework decision of 27 November 2008 regarding police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - A modest achievement however not the improvement some have hoped for

机译:2008年11月27日关于刑事事项上的警察和司法合作的数据保护框架决定-一项微不足道的成就,但并非某些人希望得到的改善

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

After more than three years in the making, that have witnessed much controversy, several working texts and at least two altogether different versions, the Data Protection Framework Decision "on the protection of personal data processed in the/ramework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters" (hereafter, the DPFD) was finally adopted on 27 November 2008. The DPFD was supposed to be celebrated as the Data Protection Directive equivalent in European law enforcement (Third Pillar) processing. However, since its formal adoption, and even before that, data protection proponents (the European Data Protection Supervisor, the Article 29 Working Party, national Data Protection Commissioners, NGOs) lamented its adoption as the result of changes that ultimately compromised data protection. Is the DPFD a disappointment to the great expectations that accompanied its first draft, back in 2006? An attempt to address this question shall be undertaken in this paper.
机译:经过三年多的酝酿,经历了许多争议,几个工作文本和至少两个完全不同的版本,数据保护框架决定“关于保护警察//架中处理的个人数据以及刑事司法合作”事项”(以下简称DPFD)最终于2008年11月27日获得通过。该DPFD被认为是欧洲执法(Third Pillar)处理中等同于数据保护指令的组织。但是,自从正式采用以来,甚至在此之前,数据保护的支持者(欧洲数据保护主管,第29条工作组,国家数据保护专员,非政府组织)都对它的采用表示遗憾,因为这些更改最终损害了数据保护。 DPFD是否对早在2006年发布其初稿时的巨大期望感到失望?本文将尝试解决这个问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号