首页> 外文期刊>Computer law & security report >Cyber-squatting: Legal implications and judicial approaches - An Indian perspective
【24h】

Cyber-squatting: Legal implications and judicial approaches - An Indian perspective

机译:网络抢注:法律含义和司法手段-印度的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present legal framework in India fails to keep in pace with the inexorable advancement of the online world. Technological advancement is inevitably faster in comparison to the response of the legal framework, but the latter needs to continuously review and adapt itself in order to provide a suitable regulatory regime. In India, the Information Technology Act 2000 is the product of such review and seeks to provide a modernized regulatory framework for e-commerce with necessary safeguards. However, there are certain loose ends that have not been adequately dealt with by the Act. The contention is that, in the present era of information and communications technology, domain names have become valuable business assets and a Trade mark in the internet world. Despite the amendment to the Information Technology Act 2000, these changes have been silent on the issue of cyber-squatting. The Judiciary has been trying to tackle this issue in the light of the Trade marks Act 1999 but this approach fails to address certain issues. This paper will highlight the issues that need attention at this time and the further legislative action that is required.
机译:印度目前的法律框架无法跟上在线世界无可阻挡的进步。与法律框架的响应相比,技术进步不可避免地要快,但是法律框架需要不断地进行审查和调整以提供适当的监管制度。在印度,《 2000年信息技术法》是此类审查的产物,旨在为电子商务提供现代化的监管框架,并提供必要的保障。但是,该法还没有适当处理某些松散的结局。争论在于,在当今的信息和通信技术时代,域名已成为互联网世界中宝贵的商业资产和商标。尽管对2000年信息技术法案进行了修订,但这些更改在网络抢注问题上一直保持沉默。司法机构一直试图根据《 1999年商标法》解决这一问题,但是这种方法无法解决某些问题。本文将重点介绍当前需要注意的问题以及需要采取的进一步立法行动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号