首页> 外文期刊>Computer law & security report >The challenge and imperative of private sector cybersecurity: An international comparison
【24h】

The challenge and imperative of private sector cybersecurity: An international comparison

机译:私营部门网络安全的挑战和当务之急:国际比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Attacks on computers and information networks, both public and private, are disclosed in the news daily. Most recently, Apple, Facebook, and Twitter acknowledged that they were attacked and were now taking additional measures to secure their networks. In January of 2013, Kaspersky Labs reported discovering malware that not only targeted government information in Eastern Europe, former Soviet republics, and Central Asia, but also had been actively doing so since 2007. The scope of global cyber attacks is staggering and the solutions to securing property and protecting national security are illusive, in large part because infrastructure is owned and operated by private, rather than public, entities. Nations struggle with choosing the most effective strategy and potential regulation of the private sector in order to reduce overall cybersecurity risk. This paper reviews the nature of cyber threats, and compares the United States and European approach to promoting cybersecurity in the private sector. Furthermore, the paper discusses how different approaches can affect cybersecurity risk, and suggests a framework for visualizing the impact of law and strategy on security.
机译:每日新闻都披露了对公共和私人计算机和信息网络的攻击。最近,Apple,Facebook和Twitter承认他们受到了攻击,现在正在采取其他措施来保护其网络。 2013年1月,卡巴斯基实验室报告称发现了不仅针对东欧,前苏联共和国和中亚政府信息的恶意软件,而且自2007年以来一直在积极地这样做。全球网络攻击的范围令人震惊,解决方案确保财产安全和保护国家安全是虚幻的,很大程度上是因为基础设施是由私人而非公共实体拥有和运营的。各国努力选择最有效的战略和对私营部门的潜在监管,以降低总体网络安全风险。本文回顾了网络威胁的性质,并比较了美国和欧洲在私营部门促进网络安全的方法。此外,本文讨论了不同的方法如何影响网络安全风险,并提出了可视化法律和策略对安全影响的框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号