首页> 外文期刊>Computer law & security report >The 2012 GLSR-LSPI seminar on privacy, data protection & cyber-security - Presented at the 7th international conference on Legal, Security and Privacy Issues in IT law (LSPI) October 2-4, 2012, Athens
【24h】

The 2012 GLSR-LSPI seminar on privacy, data protection & cyber-security - Presented at the 7th international conference on Legal, Security and Privacy Issues in IT law (LSPI) October 2-4, 2012, Athens

机译:2012年有关隐私,数据保护和网络安全的GLSR-LSPI研讨会-在2012年10月2-4日在雅典举行的第七届IT法的法律,安全和隐私问题国际会议上发表

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This has been a big year for privacy with so much going on within the EU regarding reform of data protection. What are the implications of reform here and what are the issues that concern us about the proposed new data protection regime contained in the proposed Regulation? We hear a lot about the 'right to be forgotten'. How is that possible in the digital age within the online world? And what can be done about the big players who stand charged with the erosion of privacy viz Facebook, Google, Skype & YouTube etc? How can the law keep up with technological change when the latter is moving so fast e.g. with RFID, Cloud and social networking? To what extent can data breach notification, net neutrality and privacy impact assessment help and how should the law approach issues of liability and criminality in relation to privacy? What is the state of play too in the relationship between privacy policy and state surveillance and, given its implications for privacy, what obligations should governments adopt in response to cybersecurity regulation and data management? Is there a place for privacy self-regulation and if so in what respects and how effective are the Information Commissioners who often complain of being under resourced? In reviewing the way privacy law has emerged do we now need a completely new approach to the whole issue? Has the law crept into its present form simply by default? Do we need some new thinking now that reflects the fact that law is only one dimension in the battle for privacy? If so what are the other factors we need to recognise?
机译:今年是隐私保护的重要一年,欧盟内部有关数据保护改革的工作如此之多。改革的意义何在?对于拟议法规中包含的拟议新数据保护制度,我们所关注的问题是什么?我们听到了很多有关“被遗忘的权利”的信息。在在线世界的数字时代,这怎么可能?对于那些负责保护隐私权的大公司,如Facebook,Google,Skype和YouTube等,该怎么办?当科技发展如此之快时,法律如何跟上技术发展的步伐。 RFID,云和社交网络?数据泄露通知,网络中立性和隐私影响评估在多大程度上可以提供帮助,法律应如何处理与隐私有关的责任和犯罪问题?隐私政策与状态监视之间的关系也扮演着怎样的角色?考虑到它对隐私的影响,政府应对网络安全法规和数据管理应承担哪些义务?是否存在隐私自我调节的地方?如果是,那么在哪些方面以及经常抱怨抱怨资源不足的信息专员的效果如何?在回顾隐私法的出现方式时,我们现在是否需要一种全新的方法来解决整个问题?法律是否只是默认情况下才爬上现在的形式?现在我们是否需要一些新的思想来反映法律只是隐私斗争中的一个方面这一事实?如果是这样,我们还需要识别哪些其他因素?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号