首页> 外文期刊>Computer Law Review and Technology Journal >The Future of Space Exploration: Spacex's Petitions for Inter Partes Review Against Blue Origin's Rocket-Landing Technology
【24h】

The Future of Space Exploration: Spacex's Petitions for Inter Partes Review Against Blue Origin's Rocket-Landing Technology

机译:太空探索的未来:Spacex针对Blue Origin的火箭着陆技术进行部门间审查的请愿书

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Since the end of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) Shuttle program, space exploration has become more prevalent amongst privately owned companies, like Space Exploration Technologies Corporation (SpaceX). The high cost of launching a rocket remains the determining factor in both how and when private space exploration will become a reality. Blue Origin, LLC (Blue Origin), a SpaceX competitor founded by Amazon.com CEO Jeff Bezos, secured Patent No. 8,678,321 B2 ('321 patent), which involves landing and recovering a reusable launch vehicle (RLV) in order to make rocket launching exponentially cheaper. Elon Musk, the CEO of SpaceX, filed two petitions challenging the '321 patent's validity in order to avoid potential infringement. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) denied inter partes review of Claims 14 and 15 (Petition One), stating that the "challenged claims are not amenable to construction." Thus, the PTAB was "unable to reach a determination on the reasonable likelihood of SpaceX prevailing on the ground asserted in the Petition." The PTAB, however, determined that the second petition (Petition Two) "demonstrated a reasonable likelihood that it would prevail in showing unpatentability" and granted inter partes review.
机译:自从国家航空航天局(NASA)航天飞机计划结束以来,太空探索已在诸如太空探索技术公司(SpaceX)之类的私营公司中更加普遍。发射火箭的高昂费用仍然是私人空间探索如何以及何时成为现实的决定因素。由Amazon.com首席执行官Jeff Bezos创建的SpaceX竞争对手Blue Origin,LLC(Blue Origin)获得了8,678,321 B2号专利('321专利),该专利涉及降落和回收可重复使用的运载火箭(RLV)以制造火箭。推出价格便宜的指数。 SpaceX的首席执行官埃隆·马斯克(Elon Musk)提交了两份请愿书,对321号专利的有效性提出了质疑,以避免潜在的侵权。专利审判和上诉委员会(PTAB)拒绝了对权利要求14和15(第一项)的各方审查,并指出“具有挑战性的权利要求不适合建造。”因此,PTAB无法确定。 “但是,PTAB决定第二次请愿书(第二类)证明有合理的可能性,它将显示出不可专利性”,并在各方之间达成了同意评论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号