...
首页> 外文期刊>The computer & internet lawyer >The Sky Did Not Fall: The Supreme Court Invalidated Online Retransmission of Broadcast Television in American Broadcasting Companies v. Aereo, Inc.
【24h】

The Sky Did Not Fall: The Supreme Court Invalidated Online Retransmission of Broadcast Television in American Broadcasting Companies v. Aereo, Inc.

机译:天空没有倒下:最高法院在美国广播公司诉Aereo,Inc.中使广播电视在线重新传输无效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The case of American Broadcasting Companies v. Aereo1 offered the Supreme Court another opportunity to address the impact of new technology on existing copyright law. The decision, another of a relatively robust copyright and trademark docket in recent Supreme Court terms, was fraught with implications for new digital technologies, cloud computing, and remote data storage. The Court's narrow ruling overturned the Second Circuit's decision denying copyright owners an injunction against Aereo's service, and left questions about the Copyright Act's impact on the viability of various other technologies, including cloud storage and other online streaming systems, for another day. Through a review of recent trends in television delivery systems, the Supreme Court's evaluation of television exhibition under the Copyright Act, and the decision and dissent in Aereo, many questions remain about the viability of new television delivery systems, as well as other remote computing technologies.
机译:美国广播公司诉Aereo1案为最高法院提供了另一个解决新技术对现有版权法影响的机会。这项决定是最高法院最近的一项相对稳健的版权和商标诉讼案,对新数字技术,云计算和远程数据存储产生了影响。法院的狭义裁决推翻了第二巡回法院拒绝版权拥有人禁止Aereo服务的裁决的决定,并且又对《版权法》对包括云存储和其他在线流媒体系统在内的其他各种技术的可行性产生影响的问题再提出质疑。通过回顾电视传送系统的最新趋势,最高法院根据《版权法》对电视展览的评估以及Aereo案的判决和异议,有关新电视传送系统以及其他远程计算技术的可行性仍然存在许多问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号