首页> 外文期刊>Computer Communications >Multiple link failures survivability of optical networks with traffic grooming capability
【24h】

Multiple link failures survivability of optical networks with traffic grooming capability

机译:具有流量疏导功能的光网络的多链路故障生存能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper investigates the problem of survivable traffic grooming (STG) in shared mesh optical networks and proposes different frameworks for improving the survivability of low speed demands against multiple near simultaneous failures. Spare capacity reprovisioning has recently been considered for improving the overall network restorability in the event of dual failures; here, after the recovery form the first failure, some connections in the network may become unprotected and exposed to new failures. Capacity reprovisioning then allocates protection resources to unprotected and vulnerable connections so that the network can withstand a future failure. In this paper, we propose two different reprovisioning schemes (lightpath level reprovisioning, LLR, and connection level reprovisioning, CLR); they differ in the granularity at which protection resources are reprovisioned. Further, each of these schemes is suitable for a different survivable grooming policy. While LLR provides collective reprovisioning of connections at the lightpath level, CLR reprovisions spare bandwidth for lower speed connections instead. We use simulation methods to study the performance of these schemes under two grooming policies (PAL and PAC), and we show that while CLR reprovisions substantially many more connections than LLR (i.e., potentially more management overhead) CLR yields a much better network robustness to simultaneous failures due to its superior flexibility in using network resources.
机译:本文研究了共享网状光网络中可生存流量疏导(STG)问题,并提出了不同的框架来提高低速需求的可生存性,以应对多个近乎同时发生的故障。最近已经考虑了备用容量的重新配置,以在出现双重故障的情况下改善整个网络的可恢复性。此处,从第一个故障恢复后,网络中的某些连接可能会失去保护并暴露于新故障。然后,容量重新配置会将保护资源分配给不受保护的易受攻击的连接,以便网络可以承受将来的故障。在本文中,我们提出了两种不同的重新配置方案(光路级别重新配置LLR和连接级别重新配置CLR)。它们在重新分配保护资源的粒度上有所不同。此外,这些方案中的每一个都适合于不同的可生存修饰策略。尽管LLR在光路径级别上集体重新分配连接,但CLR却为较低速度的连接重新分配了备用带宽。我们使用仿真方法来研究这些方案在两种修饰策略(PAL和PAC)下的性能,并且我们证明,尽管CLR提供的连接数量远多于LLR(即可能会增加管理开销),但CLR产生的网络健壮性要好得多。由于其在使用网络资源方面的卓越灵活性而导致的同时故障。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号