...
首页> 外文期刊>Computer communication review >An Evaluation of Tail Loss Recovery Mechanisms for TCP
【24h】

An Evaluation of Tail Loss Recovery Mechanisms for TCP

机译:TCP的尾部丢失恢复机制的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Interactive applications do not require more bandwidth to go faster. Instead, they require less latency. Unfortunately, the current design of transport protocols such as TCP limits possible latency reductions. In this paper we evaluate and compare different loss recovery enhancements to fight tail loss latency. The two recently proposed mechanisms "RTO Restart" (RTOR) and "Tail Loss Probe" (TLP) as well as a new mechanism that applies the logic of RTOR to the TLP timer management (TLPR) are considered. The results show that the relative performance of RTOR and TLP when tail loss occurs is scenario dependent, but with TLP having potentially larger gains. The TLPR mechanism reaps the benefits of both approaches and in most scenarios it shows the best performance.
机译:交互式应用程序不需要更多的带宽就能更快地运行。相反,它们需要更少的延迟。不幸的是,诸如TCP之类的传输协议的当前设计限制了可能的等待时间减少。在本文中,我们评估并比较了不同的丢失恢复增强功能,以对抗拖尾丢失延迟。考虑了最近提出的两种机制“ RTO重新启动”(RTOR)和“尾丢失探测”(TLP),以及将RTOR逻辑应用于TLP计时器管理(TLPR)的新机制。结果表明,发生尾部损失时RTOR和TLP的相对性能取决于场景,但是TLP具有潜在的更大收益。 TLPR机制可从这两种方法中受益,并且在大多数情况下,它表现出最佳的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号