首页> 外文期刊>Computational Geosciences >OLYMPUS optimization under geological uncertainty
【24h】

OLYMPUS optimization under geological uncertainty

机译:地质不确定性下的奥林巴斯优化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Field development strategies are crucial for reservoir management, and over the last decade there has been quite some development of new optimization algorithms for solving this problem when the uncertainty in the reservoir description is provided by a set of reservoir models. To compare different approaches for this problem, the OLYMPUS benchmark challenge (Fonseca et al. 2018; TNO 2017) was defined, with three different tasks: well control optimization (task 1), field development optimization (task 2), and joint field development and well control optimization (task 3). This work presents solutions to the three exercises with two main optimization methods and problem-specific workflows. The main algorithms used in all three exercises are the ensemble-based optimization (EnOpt) and the line search derivative-free (LSDF) method. EnOpt is constructed for solving optimization problems where the uncertainty is represented by an ensemble of models, and in general it produced good results. However, we also found that the LSDF played an important role in quality checking the results obtained by EnOpt, and in some cases it provided superior results.
机译:现场开发策略对于水库管理至关重要,在过去十年中,在储存器描述的不确定性由一组储存器模型提供时,在储存器描述的不确定性时已经存在了相当大的开发新的优化算法。为了比较这个问题的不同方法,奥林巴斯基准挑战(Fonseca等,2018; TNO 2017)被定义,具有三个不同的任务:井控制优化(任务1),现场开发优化(任务2)和联合现场开发和控制优化(任务3)。这项工作提出了三种练习的解决方案,具有两个主要优化方法和特定于问题的工作流程。所有三种练习中使用的主要算法是基于合奏的优化(Enopt)和线路搜索衍生(LSDF)方法。构建ENOPT以解决不确定性由模型的集合表示的优化问题,通常它产生了良好的结果。但是,我们还发现,LSDF在质量检查Enopt获得的结果中发挥了重要作用,并且在某些情况下提供了卓越的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号