首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Network Industries >R. Konings, H. Priemus Et Al. (eds), The Future Of Intermodal Freight Transport: Operations, Design And Policy, Transport Economics, Management And Policy, Northampton, Ma: Edward Elgar, 2008, Isbn 978-1-84542-238-7
【24h】

R. Konings, H. Priemus Et Al. (eds), The Future Of Intermodal Freight Transport: Operations, Design And Policy, Transport Economics, Management And Policy, Northampton, Ma: Edward Elgar, 2008, Isbn 978-1-84542-238-7

机译:R. Konings,H。Priemus等。 (eds),《多式联运的未来:运营,设计与政策,运输经济学,管理与政策》,北安普敦,马萨诸塞州:爱德华·埃尔加,2008年,ISBN 978-1-84542-238-7

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Even before the First World War, an early road-rail-sea tri-modal transport service was operated between Paris and London. It used 2×2×2 metres wide wooden boxes ("cadres"). Ever since, expectations for intermodal transport have been more prominent than actual progress which has been constrained by inevitable historical and conceptual barriers. In fact, "...the brutal reality is that intermodal is of no interest to most European users; trucking is the norm" (p. 227, chapter 12). Thus, a book on the "future of intermodal transport" is bound to attract attention.rnThe underlying concept of intermodal transport is extremely simple: "Intermodal transport challenges each of the conventional transport modes to consider how it does what it does. Suddenly, every mode has to compete for its place in an intermodal service. Some rise to the challenge; others fail." (p. 225, chapter 12). In practice, however, many barriers need to be overcome for an efficient intermodal system to develop. These include low levels of interconnectivity between modes, as well as interoperability within the modes. "Interconnectivity increases the choices" whereas "interoperability... might seriously impede individual modes from competing" (p. 226, chapter 12). Therefore, intermodality is really about competition versus cooperation in a network industry, i.e., "coopetition" through total systems costs.
机译:甚至在第一次世界大战之前,巴黎和伦敦之间就已经开展了早期的公路-铁路-海运三联运输服务。它使用了2×2×2米宽的木箱(“干部”)。从那时起,人们对多式联运的期望比实际进展更加突出,而实际进展却受到不可避免的历史和概念障碍的制约。实际上,“……残酷的现实是,大多数欧洲用户对联运不感兴趣;货车运输是常态”(第227页,第12章)。因此,有关“多式联运的未来”的书必将引起人们的注意。rn多式联运的基本概念非常简单:“多式联运挑战了每种传统的运输方式,以考虑其做事方式。模式必须在多式联运服务中争取自己的位置。有些挑战,有些则失败。” (第225页,第12章)。然而,在实践中,要发展有效的联运系统,需要克服许多障碍。其中包括模式之间的互连程度较低,以及模式之间的互操作性。 “互连性增加了选择”,而“互操作性……可能会严重阻碍单个模式的竞争”(第226页,第12章)。因此,联运实际上是关于网络行业中的竞争与合作,即通过总系统成本进行的“竞争”。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Network Industries》 |2008年第4期|411-413|共3页
  • 作者

    R. Alexander Roehrl;

  • 作者单位

    Network Industries (MIR), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne (EPFL), Bassenges Station 5, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号