Robert A. Pape's denial theory forms the best corroborated theory to guide coercive strategy. Denial theory, however, provides a fundamentally flawed causal model because it neglects the complexity of the causal dynamics of compellence on two accounts: it fails to address strategic interaction between opponents and it seeks to provide a univariate explanation for a multicausal phenomenon. To address these two weaknesses, a new theory of grand strategic denial is developed. The implication of this new theory is that it is the target's grand strategy that must be undermined, not its military strategy per se.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2010.510371
展开▼
机译:罗伯特·A·帕佩(Robert A. Pape)的否认理论构成了指导强制策略的最佳佐证理论。但是,拒绝论提供了一个根本上有缺陷的因果模型,因为它忽略了两个方面的强迫因果关系动力学的复杂性:它无法解决对手之间的战略互动,它试图为多因果现象提供单变量解释。为了解决这两个弱点,发展了一种新的大战略否定理论。这种新理论的含义是,必须破坏目标的宏伟战略,而不是其军事战略本身。查看全文下载全文,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2010.510371
展开▼