首页> 外文期刊>Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE >A Comparison Between the Centralized and Distributed Approaches for Spectrum Management
【24h】

A Comparison Between the Centralized and Distributed Approaches for Spectrum Management

机译:集中式和分布式频谱管理方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There is a growing demand for spectrum to accommodate future wireless services and applications. Given the rigidity of current allocations, several spectrum occupancy studies have indicated a low utilization over both space and time. Hence, to satisfy the demands of applications it can be inferred that dynamic spectrum usage is a required necessity. Centralized Dynamic Spectrum Allocation (DSA) and Distributed Dynamic Spectrum Selection (DSS) are two paradigms that aim to address this problem, whereby we use DSS (distributed) as an umbrella term for a range of terminologies for decentralized access, such as Opportunistic Spectrum Access and Dynamic Spectrum Access. This paper presents a survey on these methods, whereby we introduce, discuss, and classify several proposed architectures, techniques and solutions. Corresponding challenges from a technical point of view are also investigated, as are some of the remaining open issues. The final and perhaps most significant contribution of this work is to provide a baseline for systematically comparing the two approaches, revealing the pros and cons of DSA (centralized) and DSS (distributed) as methods of realizing spectrum sharing.
机译:对频谱的需求不断增长,以适应未来的无线服务和应用。考虑到当前分配的刚性,一些频谱占用研究表明,空间和时间利用率都较低。因此,为了满足应用需求,可以推断出动态频谱使用是必需的。集中式动态频谱分配(DSA)和分布式动态频谱选择(DSS)是旨在解决此问题的两个范式,因此我们将DSS(分布式)用作分散式接入(例如机会频谱接入)的一系列术语的总称。和动态频谱访问。本文对这些方法进行了概述,从而介绍,讨论和分类了几种提议的体系结构,技术和解决方案。从技术角度来看,相应的挑战也得到了调查,还有一些尚待解决的问题。这项工作的最后也是最重要的贡献是为系统比较这两种方法提供了一个基线,揭示了DSA(集中式)和DSS(分布式)作为实现频谱共享的方法的利弊。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号