首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Communications Magazine >Patents and standardization, part 3: commitments to license standard-essential patents under reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND) terms
【24h】

Patents and standardization, part 3: commitments to license standard-essential patents under reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND) terms

机译:专利和标准化,第3部分:在合理和非歧视(RAND)条款下许可标准必要专利的承诺

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Many standards development organizations ask participants who hold patents that may be essential to practice a standard to agree to license those patents under "reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND)" terms. But what exactly are RAND terms? This article discusses the policy of RAND obligations, explains how disputes can arise about whether a proposed license to a standard-essential patent includes RAND terms, and explains how a particular dispute over RAND terms was resolved in a United States district court.
机译:许多标准开发组织都要求持有专利的参与者(对于实施标准可能是必不可少的)同意以“合理且非歧视(RAND)”的条款许可这些专利。但是,RAND术语到底是什么?本文讨论了RAND义务的政策,解释了如何对标准必要专利的拟议许可是否包含RAND条款产生争议,并解释了如何在美国地方法院解决有关RAND条款的特定争议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号